Bug#670488: audacious: New upstream version available

notfound 670488 3.2.1-2 thanks Audacious 3.3.1 released August 11, 2012 This release fixes a few bugs, including #141, #154, and #155, and updates some translations. Also, with some help from the community, we are now able to provide a working build of this version for Windows. http://audaciou

python-pyknon_1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, * build-depend on python-all-dev (>= 2.6.6-3~) for proper dh_python2 support (it should be enough to use python-all, though) * XS-Python-Version should be X-Python-Version * architecture should be all, not any (unless I'm missing something) * don't depend on python interpreter directly, use

Processed: Re: audacious: New upstream version available

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 670488 3.2.1-2 Bug #670488 [audacious] audacious: New upstream version available No longer marked as found in versions audacious/3.2.1-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 670488: http://bug

Bug#684928: volti: volume level numerical values differ from the ones shown by alsamixer

Package: volti Version: 0.2.3-4 Severity: normal Hello and thanks for maintaining Volti in Debian! I've just installed this package and I'm giving it a try. I noticed that the internal mixer shows volume level numerical values that differ from the ones shown by alsamixer. I think that this is ve

Bug#684917: document improved multimedia capabilities starting w/ Wheezy

Package: release-notes On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 10:34:46AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 26.07.2012 16:40, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > >Am 25.07.2012 20:30, schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli: > >>Can you please review them and/or (better "and", in fact) report a bug > >>against release-notes to ensu

Re: Fixing SC in testing

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Dan S wrote: > > 2012/8/12 Felipe Sateler : > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Reinhard Tartler > > wrote: > >> request SC to be > >> removed from testing and consider 3.5 as a good target for > >> wheezy-backports. > > > > Dan, what do you think? Do you prefer

Re: Fixing SC in testing

2012/8/12 Felipe Sateler : > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> request SC to be >> removed from testing and consider 3.5 as a good target for >> wheezy-backports. > > Dan, what do you think? Do you prefer 3.4 in wheezy if 3.5 cannot > migrate, or would you prefer to provi