Re: getting openni2 into Debian

Hi. Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org hat am 20. November 2013 um 20:13 geschrieben: The first thing that needs doing is the debian/copyright file. All of the various licenses of the code that are included in the openni source release need to be marked in there, or the Debian

Bug#729145: libfaac-dev: No amd64 package

Am Samstag, den 09.11.2013, 16:13 +0100 schrieb Lorenzo: Please package for amd64 According to the Debian Developer's Reference [1], the following steps are required to enable a non-free package to be auto-built: 1. Check whether it is legally allowed and technically possible to

Bug#729145: libfaac-dev: No amd64 package

On 21/11/2013 10:11, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am Samstag, den 09.11.2013, 16:13 +0100 schrieb Lorenzo: Please package for amd64 According to the Debian Developer's Reference [1], the following steps are required to enable a non-free package to be auto-built: 1. Check whether it is

Re: getting openni2 into Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-11-21 09:30, Hauke Wintjen wrote: Why do you change the SONAME from upstream? That's a pretty unusual thing to do. patches/0001-Add-SONAME-to-libraries.patch Because upstream does not add a SONAME and jsprickerhoff had it in its

Re: getting openni2 into Debian

* IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at [2013-11-21 10:37]: it's always best to follow upstream as closely as possible (as long as they make sane assumptions :-)), esp. in picky areas like SONAMEing. if your package has not been in debian yet (which i think is true), you should get rid of any

Processing of libltc_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes

libltc_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libltc_1.1.3-1.dsc libltc_1.1.3.orig.tar.gz libltc_1.1.3-1.debian.tar.gz libltc-dev_1.1.3-1_amd64.deb libltc-doc_1.1.3-1_all.deb libltc11_1.1.3-1_amd64.deb libltc-dbg_1.1.3-1_amd64.deb Greetings,

libltc_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:53:43 +0100 Source: libltc Binary: libltc-dev libltc-doc libltc11 libltc-dbg Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.1.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia

[bts-link] source package easytag

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package easytag # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #727811 (http://bugs.debian.org/727811) # Bug title: easytag: Does not accept a path

Bug#709256: marked as done (mjpegtools: broken symlink /usr/bin/lav2avi)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:19:54 + with message-id e1vjw2s-0003oq...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#709256: fixed in mjpegtools 1:2.1.0+debian-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #709256, regarding mjpegtools: broken symlink /usr/bin/lav2avi to be marked as done. This

Re: getting openni2 into Debian

On 11/21/2013 04:41 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: * IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at [2013-11-21 10:37]: it's always best to follow upstream as closely as possible (as long as they make sane assumptions :-)), esp. in picky areas like SONAMEing. if your package has not been in debian yet

Processing of x42-plugins_20131119-1_amd64.changes

x42-plugins_20131119-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: x42-plugins_20131119-1.dsc x42-plugins_20131119.orig.tar.xz x42-plugins_20131119-1.debian.tar.gz x42-plugins_20131119-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

Bug#727097: marked as done (mjpegtools: trying to overwrite errors for library dependencies of mjpegtools)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:19:54 + with message-id e1vjw2s-0003oy...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#727097: fixed in mjpegtools 1:2.1.0+debian-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #727097, regarding mjpegtools: trying to overwrite errors for library dependencies of

Bug#727635: marked as done (lib*-2.1-0 and lib*-2.0-0: error when trying to install together)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:19:54 + with message-id e1vjw2s-0003p5...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#727635: fixed in mjpegtools 1:2.1.0+debian-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #727635, regarding lib*-2.1-0 and lib*-2.0-0: error when trying to install together to be

Processed: [bts-link] source package easytag

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package easytag # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

x42-plugins_20131119-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:10:34 +0100 Source: x42-plugins Binary: x42-plugins Architecture: source amd64 Version: 20131119-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers

mjpegtools_2.1.0+debian-2.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 13:47:23 +0100 Source: mjpegtools Binary: mjpegtools mjpegtools-dbg mjpegtools-gtk libmjpegtools-dev liblavfile-2.1-0 liblavjpeg-2.1-0 liblavplay-2.1-0 libmjpegutils-2.1-0 libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0

Bug#730108: vamp-plugin-sdk: Unnecessarily shipped libtool archive (.la) files are invalid

Package: vamp-plugin-sdk Version: 2.1-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, The libtool archive files /usr/lib/libvamp-hostsdk.la and /usr/lib/libvamp-sdk.la are invalid and break building packages with libtool. Please remove these files from the package in stable. They are already removed in