Bug#732142: transcode: FTBFS with freetype 2.5.1

Source: transcode Version: 3:1.1.7-6 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Tags: sid jessie transcode fails to build against the current version of freetype: | /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.

Processed: limit source to transcode, tagging 732142

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #transcode (3:1.1.7-8) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium > # > # * Fix compilation with recent versions of freetype. (Closes: #732142) > # > limit source transcode Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'transcode' Limit current

[PATCH] bugs.cgi: Add query for Multimedia team

Hi, please consider the attached patch so that bugs in packages maintained by the multimedia team can be selected. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher From bfd0743bfe977e63018f5f9874c2de0a7bfd88e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Ramacher Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 18:51:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH]

Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

Package: mplayer Severity: serious Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org - Last upload nearly two years ago - FTBFS for a long time - Incompatible with current libav - Alternatives exist (mplayer2, mpv) Cheers, Moritz __

Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org > > - Last upload nearly two years ago > - FTBFS for a long time > - Incompatible with current libav > - Alternatives exist (mplayer2, mpv) I definitely agree. BT

Bug#732162: build-depends does not mention minimum version for libdrm-dev

Source: intel-vaapi-driver Version: 1.2.1-2 Severity: normal This is shown by configure when run on wheezy system (after updating libva*): configure:13048: checking for DRM configure:13055: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "libdrm >= $LIBDRM_VERSION" Requested 'libdrm >= 2.4.45' but version of

Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

I've added debian-devel for further input, as I believe the consequences are a bit wider than expected. On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: mplayer > Severity: serious > > Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org > > - Last upload

Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> Package: mplayer >> Severity: serious >> >> Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org >> >> - Last upload nearly two years ago >> - FTBFS for a long time >