On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Dan S wrote:
> 2014-10-01 4:18 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler :
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Dan S wrote:
On 10 Sep 2014 06:43, "Dan S" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just trying to import the latest version of supercollider. I'm having
> a
Bimack Technicien en FRANCE
Display problems? Try to view the newsletter in your browser. (
http://www.bimackmail.it/?email_id=19&user_id=112591&urlpassed=W3ZpZXdfaW5fYnJvd3Nlcl9saW5rXQ%3D%3D&controller=stats&action=analyse&wysija-page=1&wysijap=subscriptions
)
Bimack Technicien en FRANCE
08
Martin Steghöfer wrote:
> Please find attached a new debdiff including the mentioned changes.
Anyone still following this or have I put everyone to sleep with my
lengthy patches? ;-)
Anyway, a last little update... In order to make things more solid, I
did what I proposed in my first post:
FYI: The status of the jackd2 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.9.10+20140719git3eb0ae6a~dfsg-1
Current version: 1.9.10+20140719git3eb0ae6a~dfsg-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into te
Control: tag -1 + upstream
Hi!
On 2014-10-02 at 13:54 (CEST), Daniele Forsi wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> could Blender be changed to check if it is running on a supported CPU
> and fail with a nicely informative error message?
At [1] you can see that the former patch that used to check about
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + upstream
Bug #763755 [blender] blender: SIGILL on startup
Added tag(s) upstream.
--
763755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763755
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: blender
Version: 2.71+dfsg1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
could Blender be changed to check if it is running on a supported CPU and fail
with a nicely informative error message?
On my PC blender is terminated on startup with:
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction
Package: mpv
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Now that ffmpeg is in experimental (via #729203), would you consider
creating a mpv-ffmpeg package, which would be identical to mpv, but
instead of linking libav would link ffmpeg?
According to mpv documentation, FFmpeg is preferred over Libav
http
