gavl_1.4.0-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:11 + Source: gavl Binary: libgavl1 libgavl1-dbg libgavl-dev libgavl-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.4.0-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Mai

Processing of gavl_1.4.0-4_amd64.changes

gavl_1.4.0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gavl_1.4.0-4.dsc gavl_1.4.0-4.debian.tar.xz libgavl-dev_1.4.0-4_amd64.deb libgavl-doc_1.4.0-4_all.deb libgavl1-dbg_1.4.0-4_amd64.deb libgavl1_1.4.0-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daem

lv2-c++-tools_1.0.5-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:10:21 + Source: lv2-c++-tools Binary: lv2-c++-tools libpaq0 libpaq-dev lv2-c++-tools-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.0.5-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian

Processing of lv2-c++-tools_1.0.5-2_amd64.changes

lv2-c++-tools_1.0.5-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lv2-c++-tools_1.0.5-2.dsc lv2-c++-tools_1.0.5-2.debian.tar.xz libpaq-dev_1.0.5-2_amd64.deb libpaq0-dbgsym_1.0.5-2_amd64.deb libpaq0_1.0.5-2_amd64.deb lv2-c++-tools-dbgsym_1.0.5-2_amd64.deb lv2

Bug#815024: RFS: autotalent/0.2-5

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autotalent" * Package name: autotalent Version : 0.2-5 Upstream Author : Thomas A. Baran * URL : http://tombaran.info/autotalent.html * License : BSD-3-cla

pd-iemutils_0.0.20160217-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:29:38 +0100 Source: pd-iemutils Binary: pd-iemutils pd-iem Architecture: source Version: 0.0.20160217-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By:

Processed: Bug#785260 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 785260 pending Bug #785260 [autotalent] autotalent: package description grammarfix Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 785260: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Processing of pd-iemutils_0.0.20160217-2_amd64.changes

pd-iemutils_0.0.20160217-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pd-iemutils_0.0.20160217-2.dsc pd-iemutils_0.0.20160217-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __

Processing of supercollider-sc3-plugins_3.7.0~beta+git20151221.f978dc2~repack-5_amd64.changes

/supercollider-sc3-plugins_3.7.0~beta+git20151221.f978dc2~repack-5_amd64.changes is already present on target host: supercollider-sc3-plugins_3.7.0~beta+git20151221.f978dc2~repack-5.debian.tar.xz Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first. Job supercollider-sc3-plugins_3.7.0~beta+

Bug#814258: marked as done (vlc: hotkey CTRL+L does not open playlist with locale LANG=de_DE.UTF-8)

Your message dated Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:52:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#814258: fixed in vlc 2.2.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #814258, regarding vlc: hotkey CTRL+L does not open playlist with locale LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#814646: marked as done (vlc: unhandled symlink to directory conversion: /usr/share/doc/PACKAGE, /usr/share/bug/PACKAGE)

Your message dated Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:52:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#814646: fixed in vlc 2.2.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #814646, regarding vlc: unhandled symlink to directory conversion: /usr/share/doc/PACKAGE, /usr/share/bug/PACKAGE to be marked as done. This means

vlc_2.2.2-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:21:32 +0100 Source: vlc Binary: libvlc-dev libvlc5 libvlccore-dev libvlccore8 vlc vlc-data vlc-nox vlc-plugin-fluidsynth vlc-plugin-jack vlc-plugin-notify vlc-plugin-sdl vlc-plugin-svg vlc-plugin-z

Processing of vlc_2.2.2-4_amd64.changes

vlc_2.2.2-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: vlc_2.2.2-4.dsc vlc_2.2.2-4.debian.tar.xz vlc-data_2.2.2-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimed

libebur128_1.1.0-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:06:59 +0100 Source: libebur128 Binary: libebur128-dev libebur128-1 Architecture: source Version: 1.1.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By:

Processing of libebur128_1.1.0-1_source.changes

libebur128_1.1.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libebur128_1.1.0-1.dsc libebur128_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz libebur128_1.1.0-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __

Re: Call for uploaders (was: orphaning packages)

Hi Alessio, I am happy to take over the following packages, because they are seeded in Ubuntu Studio: autotalent libshout-idjc lv2vocoder mudita24 I will add myself to Uploaders soon (as I connect to upstream mailing lists). 4 less bugs to file :-) On 02/16/2016 09:44 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:

rtaudio_4.1.1~ds0-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:58:48 + Source: rtaudio Binary: librtaudio4v5 librtaudio-dev librtaudio-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 4.1.1~ds0-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Ma

Processing of rtaudio_4.1.1~ds0-4_amd64.changes

rtaudio_4.1.1~ds0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rtaudio_4.1.1~ds0-4.dsc rtaudio_4.1.1~ds0-4.debian.tar.xz librtaudio-dbg_4.1.1~ds0-4_amd64.deb librtaudio-dev_4.1.1~ds0-4_amd64.deb librtaudio4v5_4.1.1~ds0-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debi

x265 1.9-3 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the x265 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.8-6 Current version: 1.9-3 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later

pd-iemutils_0.0.20160217-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:46:22 +0100 Source: pd-iemutils Binary: pd-iemutils pd-iem Architecture: source Version: 0.0.20160217-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By:

Processing of pd-iemutils_0.0.20160217-1_amd64.changes

pd-iemutils_0.0.20160217-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pd-iemutils_0.0.20160217-1.dsc pd-iemutils_0.0.20160217.orig.tar.gz pd-iemutils_0.0.20160217-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___

Re: preparing new RtMidi release, question about SO version

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 17 February 2016 at 12:02, Stephen Sinclair wrote: >> Thanks very much Felipe, that clarifies things immensely. > > :) > >> >> A last question, is there a difference between using this -release >> style versioning and simply bumping the

Re: preparing new RtMidi release, question about SO version

On 17 February 2016 at 12:02, Stephen Sinclair wrote: > Thanks very much Felipe, that clarifies things immensely. :) > > A last question, is there a difference between using this -release > style versioning and simply bumping the SO name on every release? The only appreciable difference I see i

Re: preparing new RtMidi release, question about SO version

Thanks very much Felipe, that clarifies things immensely. A last question, is there a difference between using this -release style versioning and simply bumping the SO name on every release? In any case, I'll keep these recommendations in mind for all my projects (which for some reason always see

Bug#814984: Supercollider: Add hardening flags to debian/rules in supercollider source package

On 17 February 2016 at 10:14, Hanno Zulla wrote: > Hi, > >> I have not tested this, does this actually pass the right variables? >> I'm wary of the interactions between the cdbs rules and including >> dpkg's makefile snippet. Unfortunately , bug #712729 means the >> built-int support in cdbs is cu

Bug#814984: Supercollider: Add hardening flags to debian/rules in supercollider source package

Hi, > I have not tested this, does this actually pass the right variables? > I'm wary of the interactions between the cdbs rules and including > dpkg's makefile snippet. Unfortunately , bug #712729 means the > built-int support in cdbs is currently broken :( When I tested it locally, lintian stop

Bug#814984: Supercollider: Add hardening flags to debian/rules in supercollider source package

On 17 February 2016 at 07:42, Hanno Zulla wrote: > Source: supercollider > Version: 1:3.6.6_repack-2-2 > Severity: minor > > Hi there, Hi, > > sid's lintian complains about missing hardening in the supercollider > build. This patch adds the needed flags. > > Please let me know > > a) if this pat

Bug#814496: marked as done (liblrdf: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'distclean'.)

Your message dated Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:05:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#814496: fixed in liblrdf 0.4.0-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #814496, regarding liblrdf: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'distclean'. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

liblrdf_0.4.0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:44:12 +0100 Source: liblrdf Binary: liblrdf0-dev liblrdf0 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.4.0-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By: Jo

Processing of liblrdf_0.4.0-6_amd64.changes

liblrdf_0.4.0-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: liblrdf_0.4.0-6.dsc liblrdf_0.4.0-6.debian.tar.xz liblrdf0-dbgsym_0.4.0-6_amd64.deb liblrdf0-dev_0.4.0-6_amd64.deb liblrdf0_0.4.0-6_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on ho

Processed: Bug#814496 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 814496 pending Bug #814496 [src:liblrdf] liblrdf: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'distclean'. Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 814496: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Processing of liblrdf_0.4.0-6_amd64.changes

liblrdf_0.4.0-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: liblrdf_0.4.0-6.dsc liblrdf_0.4.0-6.debian.tar.xz liblrdf0-dbgsym_0.4.0-6_amd64.deb liblrdf0-dev_0.4.0-6_amd64.deb liblrdf0_0.4.0-6_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (r

Bug#814984: Supercollider: Add hardening flags to debian/rules in supercollider source package

Source: supercollider Version: 1:3.6.6_repack-2-2 Severity: minor Hi there, sid's lintian complains about missing hardening in the supercollider build. This patch adds the needed flags. Please let me know a) if this patch is correct b) if this is the proper format to submit it c) if this is t

supercollider-sc3-plugins_3.7.0~beta+git20151221.f978dc2~repack-5_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:ladspalist is NEW. binary:sc3-plugins is NEW. binary:sc3-plugins-language is NEW. binary:sc3-plugins-server is NEW. source:supercollider-sc3-plugins is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid

My.Dear. Compliment!

-- -- Compliment! I have received the ATM CARD from the Bank three days ago and kept the ATM CARD with Mr. Rigule Williams as we discussed, therefore mail him immediately to send the ATM CARD to you. I am in Coloumbia now, i kept ( USD$5.2,000.000.00 Dollars ) ATM CARD after my business trip

Re: supercollider-sc3-plugins_3.7.0~beta+git20151221.f978dc2~repack-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, Thank you for your review. We have reviewed the copyright file and indeed found a mistake that has been fixed for the recently uploaded version -5 of the package. Allow me to clarify this problem you mentioned: > unfortunately you forgot the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license mentioned in > supe

Bug#814976: whitedune: FTBFS: dune1.rc.c:1392: syntax error

Source: whitedune Version: 0.30.10-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, whitedune fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

Cher associé,

Cher associé, Je suis le responsable du Département comptabilité de la Bank Of Africa du Burkina (BOA)au Burkina Faso. Je sais que vous recevrez ce mail avec un sentiment de surprise mais vous n'avez pas à vous inquiéter de rien. J'ai décidé de vous contacter pour une transaction qui nous se

Processing of supercollider-sc3-plugins_3.7.0~beta+git20151221.f978dc2~repack-5_amd64.changes

supercollider-sc3-plugins_3.7.0~beta+git20151221.f978dc2~repack-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: supercollider-sc3-plugins_3.7.0~beta+git20151221.f978dc2~repack-5.dsc supercollider-sc3-plugins_3.7.0~beta+git20151221.f978dc2~repack.orig.tar.xz supercol