swh-lv2_1.0.16+git20160519~repack0-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 08:18:21 +0200 Source: swh-lv2 Binary: swh-lv2 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.0.16+git20160519~repack0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-B

Processing of swh-lv2_1.0.16+git20160519~repack0-2_amd64.changes

2016-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
swh-lv2_1.0.16+git20160519~repack0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: swh-lv2_1.0.16+git20160519~repack0-2.dsc swh-lv2_1.0.16+git20160519~repack0-2.debian.tar.xz swh-lv2-dbgsym_1.0.16+git20160519~repack0-2_amd64.deb swh-lv2_1.0.16+git20160519~repack0-2

swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160602~repack1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:57 +0200 Source: swh-plugins Binary: swh-plugins Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.4.16+git20160602~repack1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers C

Processing of swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160602~repack1-1_amd64.changes

2016-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160602~repack1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160602~repack1-1.dsc swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160602~repack1.orig.tar.xz swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160602~repack1-1.debian.tar.xz swh-plugins-dbgsym_0.4.16+g

Re: kodi_16.0+dfsg1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-06-01 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Tobias, I have updated kodi (to 16.x) and kodiplatform in jessie-backports and I plan updating the PVR addons I usually upload, too. Do you plan updating the VNSI and hts addons? Cheers, Balint 2016-03-03 15:52 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey : > Hi Tobias, > > 2016-03-03 0:06 GMT+01:00 Tobias Grimm

Bug#721617: [liblo] Bug#721617: pyliblo: FTBFS on sparc: testSendOthers (unit.ServerTestCase) ... Bus error (core dumped)

2016-06-01 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 06/02/2016 12:01 AM, Stephen Sinclair wrote: > That's a good attitude, currently I don't know anyone using sparc64 > with liblo nor do I have access to such a machine, so reproducing and > testing, and therefore fixing, this bug is not possible for me. So, I > look forward to your contribution.

Processed: Re: Bug#820128: vlc: Hardware decode issues/Video stops after a few seconds

2016-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #820128 [src:vlc] vlc: Hardware decode issues/Video stops after a few seconds Bug #819453 [src:vlc] vlc doesn't go fullscreen properly. Removed tag(s) moreinfo. Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > reassign -1 libvdpau-va-gl1 Bug #820128 [src:vlc] vlc:

Bug#820128: vlc: Hardware decode issues/Video stops after a few seconds

2016-06-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Control: reassign -1 libvdpau-va-gl1 [Sebastian Ramacher] >> So here's the post for more details: >> >> https://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=131509 > > The log there suggests you have libvdpau-va-gl1 installed. Does the issue go > away if you remove it? Ac

Bug#721617: [liblo] Bug#721617: pyliblo: FTBFS on sparc: testSendOthers (unit.ServerTestCase) ... Bus error (core dumped)

2016-06-01 Thread Stephen Sinclair
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:48 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > Control: severity -1 normal > >> Closing because liblo is no longer in sparc, and will not be built again >> there. > > Re-opening because in Debian we don't "fix bugs" by sweeping them under the > carpet. Als

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-01 Thread Eric Beuque
Hi, we are updating upstream package in debian, just waiting for some review before to send it to debian repository. It will be soon avaliable. 2016-06-01 23:13 GMT+02:00 Petter Reinholdtsen : > When deciding if the package should be kept or not, it might be useful to > note that there is recent

Bug#826049: kodi: No music visualizations

2016-06-01 Thread Wendigo
Package: kodi Version: 16.1+dfsg1-1~bpo8+2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, In you install Kodi 16.1 from backports music visualizations don't work anymore. I think in others distros you're supposed now to install a visualizations package. There is no visualizations package in backports. Chee

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
When deciding if the package should be kept or not, it might be useful to note that there is recent developments in the new upstream git repository mentioned in bug #813192. In other words, the upstream developer is still active, even if no update has been done to the Debian package since 2014.

Processed: Bug#822245 marked as pending

2016-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 822245 pending Bug #822245 [vlc] vlc desktop file missing Mime type 'video/vnd.mpegurl' Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 822245: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

ffmpeg_3.0.2-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 20:43:32 +0200 Source: ffmpeg Binary: ffmpeg ffmpeg-doc libavcodec57 libavcodec-extra57 libavcodec-extra libavcodec-dev libavdevice57 libavdevice-dev libavfilter6 libavfilter-dev libavformat57 libavfo

Processing of ffmpeg_3.0.2-3_amd64.changes

2016-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ffmpeg_3.0.2-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ffmpeg_3.0.2-3.dsc ffmpeg_3.0.2-3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mai

Bug#600256: ardour-i686: Loud, painful clicking noises immediately after export

2016-06-01 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2011-02-06 2:31 GMT+01:00 Steven McDonald : > Sorry about the delayed reply. I got around to setting aside some time > to test with ALSA, but decided to make sure the bug is still present > with OSS first, and it seems to be gone now. The only thing that's > changed is that I no longer use the Mul

Bug#781997: marked as done (swh-plugins: analogueOsc produces NaN under some conditions)

2016-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#781997: fixed in swh-plugins 0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #781997, regarding swh-plugins: analogueOsc produces NaN under some conditions to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#824211: marked as done (swh-plugins: Package new upstream version)

2016-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824211: fixed in swh-plugins 0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #824211, regarding swh-plugins: Package new upstream version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:47:07 +0200 Source: swh-plugins Binary: swh-plugins Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers C

mplayer 2:1.3.0-2 MIGRATED to testing

2016-06-01 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the mplayer source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2:1.3.0-1 Current version: 2:1.3.0-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rec

juce 4.2.2+repack-1 MIGRATED to testing

2016-06-01 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the juce source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.2.1+repack-2 Current version: 4.2.2+repack-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you w

deken 0.2-1 MIGRATED to testing

2016-06-01 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the deken source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.1-2 Current version: 0.2-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later

Re: swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-06-01 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2016-06-01 16:20 GMT+02:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:54:22PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> 2016-06-01 15:28 GMT+02:00 Mattia Rizzolo : >> > 2. now there are stale files in the upload queue: >> >ftp://ftp.upload.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue if any of them is broken >> >you

Processing of swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-1_amd64.changes

2016-06-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-1.dsc swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0.orig.tar.xz swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-1.debian.tar.xz swh-plugins-dbgsym_0.4.16+g

Re: swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-06-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:54:22PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2016-06-01 15:28 GMT+02:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > > 2. now there are stale files in the upload queue: > >ftp://ftp.upload.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue if any of them is broken > >your upload will fail. To remove them some DD has to

Re: swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-06-01 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2016-06-01 15:28 GMT+02:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:22:27PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> Any advice/help? > 1. use dput instead of dupload (guess even better dput-ng, which does a >hell more checks before the upload Ok > 2. now there are stale files in the upload queue

Re: swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-06-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:22:27PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Any advice/help? Yes: 1. use dput instead of dupload (guess even better dput-ng, which does a hell more checks before the upload 2. now there are stale files in the upload queue: ftp://ftp.upload.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue if a

Re: swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-06-01 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2016-06-01 0:30 GMT+02:00 Debian FTP Masters : > > > swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0-2.dsc: Refers to non-existing file > 'swh-plugins_0.4.16+git20160531~repack0.orig.tar.xz' > Perhaps you need to include the file in your upload? > Hi, I am trying upload again with orig file, but having t

Bug#824211: marked as pending

2016-06-01 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Oh, I now see what happened with swh-plugins now with '+ * Fix multi-arch path."' (I received email to deb-multimedia mailing list and replied without checking bug context). Sorry about that! I'll move my OT discussion to the mailing list. Best regards, Nicholas ___

Whatever happened to this multiarch effort?

2016-06-01 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Following up on: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824211#70 The LV2 multi-arch enabling thread stopped at the following: https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2014-January/036354.html Did anyone ever follow-up with Robin Gareus or Alessio Treglia?

Bug#824211: marked as pending

2016-06-01 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
It was not intended to install plugins to multi-arch dir. This topic was discused already once without a clear result :( http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2014-January/036278.html mira 2016-06-01 2:58 GMT+02:00 Nicholas D Steeves : > On 31 May 2016 at 16:27, Jaro

Bug#825993: Rosegarden is not proposed when opening .rg files

2016-06-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Sebastian Ramacher] > No, please don't. Please get file fixed to report the correct mimetype > instead. I'm not convinced that is possible. I've asked about this in http://bugs.debian.org/825994 >. Do you agree that it should be possible to click (or double click) on a Rosegarden file in the de

Bug#825993: Rosegarden is not proposed when opening .rg files

2016-06-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi On 2016-06-01 10:01:24, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Package: rosegarden > Version: 1:16.02-1 > Tags: patch > > When saving a file in Rosegarden, and then trying to use the KDE file > manager to open the file, Rosegarden is not listed as an option for > opening the file. The reason as far

Bug#825993: Rosegarden is not proposed when opening .rg files

2016-06-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: rosegarden Version: 1:16.02-1 Tags: patch When saving a file in Rosegarden, and then trying to use the KDE file manager to open the file, Rosegarden is not listed as an option for opening the file. The reason as far as I understand it is that the MIME type for the file as reported by fi