Bug#831537: mpv complains about being compiled against a different version of ffmpeg

Package: mpv Version: 0.18.0-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Following upgrade of ffmpeg to 7:3.1.1 I'm getting: Warning: mpv was compiled against a different version of ffmpeg

isrcsubmit is marked for autoremoval from testing

isrcsubmit 2.0.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-22 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 830554: musicbrainzngs: accesses the internet during build ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#824956: Re. the Musescore situation in sid

Fabian Greffrath dixit: >Ah, whatever. It compiled fine and so I uploaded it. So users can Looks like build-arch/binary-arch is broken. bye, //mirabilos (no, I probably wouldn’t have caught that either) -- Stéphane, I actually don’t block Googlemail, they’re just too utterly stupid to successfu

Bug#831382: closed by Sebastian Ramacher (Re: Bug#831382: mplayer2: keyboard shortcuts fail for up/down/left/right arrows.. program hangs in "seek" (apparently))

I'll take this as an impolite way of aking "Does this happen on Debian 8 Jessie as well?", and the answer is "Yes, it does indeed." On 15/07/16 20:42, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the mplayer2 package: #83

Bug#830715: marked as done (musescore not installable)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:09:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824956: fixed in musescore 2.0.3+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #824956, regarding musescore not installable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#824956: marked as done (QtQuick1 will be removed from the archive with Qt 5.6)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:09:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824956: fixed in musescore 2.0.3+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #824956, regarding QtQuick1 will be removed from the archive with Qt 5.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#821325: marked as done (musescore: new upstream release 2.0.3)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:09:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#821325: fixed in musescore 2.0.3+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #821325, regarding musescore: new upstream release 2.0.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#818619: marked as done (musescore: copyright file needs updating)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:09:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818619: fixed in musescore 2.0.3+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #818619, regarding musescore: copyright file needs updating to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#808781: marked as done (musescore: Please remove unneeded build depends)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:09:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#808781: fixed in musescore 2.0.3+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #808781, regarding musescore: Please remove unneeded build depends to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#815688: marked as done (musescore: missing user manual)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:09:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#815688: fixed in musescore 2.0.3+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #815688, regarding musescore: missing user manual to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#818795: marked as done (musescore: upstream revision is incorrect)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:09:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818795: fixed in musescore 2.0.3+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #818795, regarding musescore: upstream revision is incorrect to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#797259: marked as done (musescore: CPUS=0 not handled properly)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:09:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#797259: fixed in musescore 2.0.3+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #797259, regarding musescore: CPUS=0 not handled properly to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

musescore_2.0.3+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 19:14:43 +0200 Source: musescore Binary: musescore musescore-common musescore-soundfont-gm Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2.0.3+dfsg1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian

Re: [SCM] csound-manual/master: Switch from CDBS to dh sequencer

On 16 July 2016 at 17:52, wrote: > The following commit has been merged in the master branch: > commit 1a3f19baab5261dc56115664d714e7cce95fb7e7 > Author: Felipe Sateler > Date: Sat Jul 16 16:49:37 2016 -0400 > > Switch from CDBS to dh sequencer > Jonas, I think you only work with packages

Bug#824956: Re. the Musescore situation in sid

Fabian Greffrath dixit: >Ah, whatever. It compiled fine and so I uploaded it. So users can >upgrade their sid systems. Everything else could be buffed out in a >revision -2 upload. True. Thank you, //mirabilos (no more ~280 held packages!) -- 15:39⎜«mika:#grml» mira|AO: "mit XFree86® wär’ das n

Bug#824956: Re. the Musescore situation in sid

Am Samstag, den 16.07.2016, 19:17 + schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > I’ll compile and test it now (modulo time needed for cooking, > eating, etc). and mail back. Ah, whatever. It compiled fine and so I uploaded it. So users can upgrade their sid systems. Everything else could be buffed out in a revi

Processing of musescore_2.0.3+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes

musescore_2.0.3+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: musescore_2.0.3+dfsg1-1.dsc musescore_2.0.3+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz musescore_2.0.3+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz musescore-common_2.0.3+dfsg1-1_all.deb musescore-dbgsym_2.0.3+dfsg1-1_amd64.deb musescore-so

Bug#824956: Re. the Musescore situation in sid

Fabian Greffrath dixit: >I could do a team upload of the current state in GIT this evening. Thanks! >Could you confirm this is fine for uploading as it is now? I’ll compile and test it now (modulo time needed for cooking, eating, etc). and mail back. bye, //mirabilos -- „Cool, /usr/share/doc/

terminatorx REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the terminatorx source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.90-2 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Bug #811993: terminatorx: FTBFS with GCC 6: call overloaded is ambigu

libdrumstick REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the libdrumstick source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.5.0-3 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Bug #811736: libdrumstick: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

traverso REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the traverso source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.49.4-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Bug #812022: traverso: FTBFS with GCC 6: flexible array member... The

clam-networkeditor REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the clam-networkeditor source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.4.0-3.1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Bug #811828: clam-networkeditor: FTBFS with GCC 6: no match

clam REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the clam source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.4.0-7 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Bug #811829: clam: FTBFS with GCC 6: no match for The script that generate

din REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the din source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 5.2.1-3 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Bug #811778: din: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion The script that ge

Re: Re. the Musescore situation in sid

Hi Thorsten, I could do a team upload of the current state in GIT this evening. Could you confirm this is fine for uploading as it is now?  - Fabian Am Samstag, den 16.07.2016, 12:18 + schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > Hi everyone, > > the version in the packaging repository allegedly fixes the >

Re: musescore 2.0.3+dfsg-1

Hi Peter, Am Freitag, den 15.07.2016, 14:16 +0100 schrieb Peter Jonas: > the policy itself. This policy explicitly allows bundling when a > package is "explicitly intended to be used in this way." MuseScore is I am sorry but I believe that Jonas is right and you misunderstood this part of Policy.

Bug#831469: brp-pacu has a new version

Source: brp-pacu Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, brp-acu seems to have a new version - 2.1.2. [0] - https://sourceforge.net/projects/brp-pacu/files/brp-pacu-v2-any/2.1.2/ I do not use it. An email telling that brp-pacu is marked for autoremovel was sent and I decide to do a QA. So I checked s

Processed (with 1 error): your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 618752 0.48.5-3 Bug #618752 [inkscape] Please switch from GNOME VFS to GIO Marked as found in versions inkscape/0.48.5-3. > forwarded 823953 https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/1417470 Bug #823953 [inkscape] inkscape: PDF+Latex export c

Bug#627961: inkscape: rasterizing effects when exporting from the commandline

control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible As upstream wrote in the forwarded bug report 2 years ago: > > Version: 0.48.1-2 > > > > when exporting from the commandline to pdf, ps or eps it seems not to > > be possible to select to raster effects (…) > > Not reproduced with Inkscape 0.48.1 and curre

Processed: Re: Bug#627961: inkscape: rasterizing effects when exporting from the commandline

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible Bug #627961 [inkscape] inkscape: rasterizing effects when exporting from the commandline Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. -- 627961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627961 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#611575: marked as done ([inkscape] Print preview doesn't works without evince)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2016 13:16:29 + with message-id <20160716131626.ga...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#611575: [inkscape] Print preview doesn't works without evince has caused the Debian Bug report #611575, regarding [inkscape] Print preview doesn't works without evin

Re. the Musescore situation in sid

Hi everyone, the version in the packaging repository allegedly fixes the problem with the new Qt version. If it works as-is, can an NMU be done to get people able to dist-upgrade their sid systems at least, even if the version in the packaging git is UNRELEASED? I’m considering building it as 2.0

bs1770gain_0.4.9-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:bs1770gain is NEW. binary:bs1770gain-dbg is NEW. source:bs1770gain is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient

Processing of bs1770gain_0.4.9-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

bs1770gain_0.4.9-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: bs1770gain_0.4.9-1~bpo8+1.dsc bs1770gain_0.4.9-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz bs1770gain_0.4.9-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb bs1770gain-dbg_0.4.9-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (r

amazing and exciting

Hi, I've just heard from a friend about that amazing stuff, I'm so excited, you've got to take a look Yours, Gunnar Wolf ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org