Bug#872586: drumgizmo: FTBFS on several arches because of test failures

Hi, On 18/08/17 21:32, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Source: drumgizmo > Version: 0.9.14-2 > Severity: serious > > drumgizmo fails to build from source on several release architectures > that it used to build on because of test failures. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=drumgizmo The

Re: qm-dsp DM flag

2017-08-18 16:00 GMT+02:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 02:24:54PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > 2017-08-15 20:26 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > > > can someone grant me DM flag for qm-dsp package. > > > > > > > > ping ;) > > I need this flag to close this bug: > > https://bugs.debian

Re: qm-dsp DM flag

2017-08-18 15:31 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler : > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Jaromír Mikeš > wrote: > > > > > > 2017-08-15 20:26 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > >> > >> > >> can someone grant me DM flag for qm-dsp package. > >> > > > > ping ;) > > I need this flag to close this bug: > > https://bug

Bug#872586: drumgizmo: FTBFS on several arches because of test failures

Source: drumgizmo Version: 0.9.14-2 Severity: serious drumgizmo fails to build from source on several release architectures that it used to build on because of test failures. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=drumgizmo You can do something like the below snippet to ignore test failu

Bug#872249: marked as done (qm-dsp FTCBFS: sometimes uses the build architecture toolchain)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:10:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#872249: fixed in qm-dsp 1.7.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #872249, regarding qm-dsp FTCBFS: sometimes uses the build architecture toolchain to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Re: My Status in Debian

Hi All, As always, I am quite busy, but I just wanted to let you all know that I am now a DD. Thank you all for your encouragement, and for quickly giving me DM rights & sponsoring NEW stuff when it was required. I also wanted to give Jaromir some encouragement to apply! It doesn't matter how

qm-dsp_1.7.1-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:45:08 +0200 Source: qm-dsp Binary: libqm-dsp0 libqm-dsp-dev Architecture: source Version: 1.7.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By: Jaromí

liblo_0.29-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:12:05 -0300 Source: liblo Binary: liblo-dev liblo7 liblo-tools Architecture: source Version: 0.29-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By: Feli

Re: qm-dsp DM flag

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 02:24:54PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2017-08-15 20:26 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > > can someone grant me DM flag for qm-dsp package. > > > > > ping ;) > I need this flag to close this bug: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872249 I won't grant you DM f

Processing of liblo_0.29-1_source.changes

liblo_0.29-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: liblo_0.29-1.dsc liblo_0.29.orig.tar.gz liblo_0.29-1.debian.tar.xz liblo_0.29-1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___

Re: qm-dsp DM flag

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > > 2017-08-15 20:26 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : >> >> >> can someone grant me DM flag for qm-dsp package. >> > > ping ;) > I need this flag to close this bug: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872249 Done. Should be processe

Processing of qm-dsp_1.7.1-3_source.changes

qm-dsp_1.7.1-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: qm-dsp_1.7.1-3.dsc qm-dsp_1.7.1-3.debian.tar.xz qm-dsp_1.7.1-3_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) _

Re: qm-dsp DM flag

2017-08-15 20:26 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > > can someone grant me DM flag for qm-dsp package. > > ping ;) I need this flag to close this bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872249 best regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers ma

Bug#872503: ffmpeg: armhf SIGBUS in ff_diff_pixels_armv6 running winff autopkgtest

Control: tags -1 upstream Hi, On 18/08/17 08:25, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Hi! > > Is this issue still reproducible with current FFmpeg git head? I've just tested and yes it is still reproducible with this commit: commit f4544163b27615ecfff1b42d6acdb3672ac92399 Author: Jacob Trimble Autho

Processed: Re: Bug#872503: ffmpeg: armhf SIGBUS in ff_diff_pixels_armv6 running winff autopkgtest

Processing control commands: > tags -1 upstream Bug #872503 [src:ffmpeg] ffmpeg: armhf SIGBUS in ff_diff_pixels_armv6 running winff autopkgtest Added tag(s) upstream. -- 872503: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872503 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit

Bug#872517: ffmpeg: CVE-2017-7206: heap-based buffer over-read in embed libav

Hi, On 18/08/17 03:46, Luciano Bello wrote: > Package: ffmpeg > X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org secure-testing- > t...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Severity: grave > Tags: security > > Hi, > > the following vulnerability was published for libav (which is embed in > ffmpeg). > > CVE-2017-72

Bug#872503: ffmpeg: armhf SIGBUS in ff_diff_pixels_armv6 running winff autopkgtest

Hi! Is this issue still reproducible with current FFmpeg git head? Carl Eugen ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintain

Bug#872517: ffmpeg: CVE-2017-7206: heap-based buffer over-read in embed libav

Hi! > the following vulnerability was published for libav > (which is embed in ffmpeg). This is not true. Please provide valgrind or asan output (both show the issue easily for some avconv releases) for any affected FFmpeg version or close this issue. Carl Eugen