On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:22:27PM +0100, Arnout Engelen wrote:
Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'?
I'm not sure what you're referring to exactly.
Oh, you were referring to a comment in bug #660814 - sorry, I didn't notice
that.
Arnout
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 06:08:04PM -0300, Sergio Cipolla wrote:
d-m-o is a traditional and very respected 3rd party repository for
Debian and has been for years.
I can't tell the same of you.
I'm not sure if you're a Debian Maintainer or not (or worse, Debian
Developer) but this kind of big
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 01:42:40AM +0200, Robert Auxonne wrote:
I would like to know if there are any news about packaging sonic-visualiser
for Debian. Thanx for your answer.
The WNPP RFP/ITP has some more background:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=440835
Looks like
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:58:20PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
On 07/10/2011 06:15 AM, Arnout Engelen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:29:03AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I notice that the mediatomb package in debian is in a rather bad
shape. [1] currently lists 3 RC and 5 important
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:29:03AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I notice that the mediatomb package in debian is in a rather bad
shape. [1] currently lists 3 RC and 5 important bugs. Moreover, there
hasn't been a new upstream release for over a year.
I know that I did the last upload of
It seems this particular problem is caused by either libavformat/avformat.h
or libavutil/dict.h being missing.
It has nothing to do with LP #311180: there avformat.h was expected to be in
the wrong directory (ffmpeg instead of libavformat). This has since been fixed
upstream.
I fixed this
Hi,
From the error message, it's not quite obvious to me that that'd fix the error,
and I don't see the error here myself. Is there a way I can easily reproduce
it?
Arnout
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 04:19:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I would be happy to help maintain this - if ok with you to use CDBS.
@Arnout: Would you mind me switching the packaging from short-form dh to
CDBS?
Not at all
If not, then please release it yourself - or if needed have
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:11:25PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hmm. If the intend is to maintain an overview of a relatively large
pile of pending tasks then using usertags seem sensible to me.
But if the intend is to ping DDs then posting to our mailinglist is
better IMO.
The
use. Perhaps it then makes sense - instead of
improving PET or in addition to that - to write a git hook which
auto-applies usertags?
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 16:45:41 (CET), Arnout Engelen wrote:
So when this hook is triggered it would check the changelog, and if the
distribution field
Hi,
This package seems OK to me now - could somebody check and upload or provide
feedback?
It's in git at git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/stretchplayer.git
Kind regards,
Arnout
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 06:44:42PM +0100, Arnout Engelen wrote:
Hi,
I started on packaging
Hi,
I added and pushed 'upstream' and 'pristine-tar' branches, now, too.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:49:44PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
If I knew there was an ITP on it, I'd have given my git tree to someone. I
did a total rebuild of his debdir.
No problem - there wasn't, yet ;).
I use
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 06:43:22PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 05:34:14PM +,
raboof-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
add a simple manpage
even better if you can auto-generate the manpage at build time
with e.g. help2man, so that upstream changes
Hi,
I started on packaging stretchplayer (ITP 605256) - which was fairly easy
because upstream (Gabriel M. Beddingfield) already had an ubuntu package
ready.
I now have the lintian list down to:
Now running lintian...
W: stretchplayer source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: stretchplayer
patches to him.
Do you remember what was wrong with it? Seems to work fine now.
There was an odd license on it, too, iirc.
Looks like it's regular GPLv2+ now
Thanks!
Regards,
Arnout
On Nov 28, 2010 12:46 PM, Arnout Engelen arnou...@bzzt.net wrote:
Hi,
I started on packaging stretchplayer
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:23:48PM -0500, vogelrl wrote:
Would it be difficult to incorporate Sonic Visualizer into Debian ?
See http://www.sonicvisualiser.org/download.html
When someone wants a piece of software packaged for Debian, usually they
create a 'Request for Packaging' (RFP) to
Hello team,
Now that libdrumstick has been accepted into unstable, could somebody please
look into sponsoring kmetronome? It should be ready to go in our git.
Kind regards,
Arnout
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:26:35PM +, Luca Falavigna wrote:
you should also mention Rui Fan vanfe...@gmail.com as copyright holder.
Please fix these in your next upload.
Done:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/libdrumstick.git;a=commit;h=233f2fe1a06ffb36bac5be747d71c4003c0dbe60
Package: jackd1
Version: 1:0.118+svn3796-7
Severity: normal
When recording a stereo jack stream, After 5-15 seconds jackrec starts
recording static instead of the stream.
(in this case I was recording from qsynth. example output at
http://arnout.engelen.eu/files/dev/linuxmusicians/jackrec.wav )
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 07:06:39PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:14:28PM +, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
-debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/*.1
+usr/share/man/man1/*.1
Maybe wellknown but just for the record:
Yes, simple as that - tied with using
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:45:03PM +0200, rosea grammostola wrote:
Please review and upload jack-keyboard, a midi keyboard for JACK MIDI
http://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/jack-keyboard.git/
I'm pretty new to this as well, but fixing any lintian errors/warnings is
generally a good
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:57:57PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
I've been doing some work on the package, license information seems
missing in the sources.
Plus, no license is provided with the original tarball.
Right - the README does contain a copyright line, states it's GPL and links to
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:34:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 14:44:08 (CEST), Arnout Engelen wrote:
Right - the README does contain a copyright line, states it's GPL and
links to gnu.org
As for not including the GPL license text, is that a problem?
Yes
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:13:31AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Arnout Engelen arnou...@bzzt.net wrote:
Could you add me to the alioth project so I can check them into git there?
Done, welcome aboard!
Thanks! First version has been uploaded, I'd love
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:21:29AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
sorry for the delay.
No problem at all!
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Arnout Engelen arnou...@bzzt.net wrote:
Darcs:
-
http://darcs.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=collab-maint/jack-tools;a=summary
Mentors:
- URL
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:43:51PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:40:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Anyway, we could use both:
- git to store the packaging
- darcs to retrieve the original tarball, for example by putting a
get-orig-source target in
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:40:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On the other hand it makes sense to have debian-multimedia packages in a
consistent format, so perhaps it'd be best to maintain this package outside
of
debian-multimedia? What do you think?
IMHO quality increases as well
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 03:53:19PM +0200, Arnout Engelen wrote:
I noticed jack-tools is orphaned, and could really use an update. For example,
jack.play has been transport-aware for more than 3 years, and that didn't make
it into Debian yet.
Perhaps this package could be adopted by someone
Hi,
I noticed jack-tools is orphaned, and could really use an update. For example,
jack.play has been transport-aware for more than 3 years, and that didn't make
it into Debian yet.
Perhaps this package could be adopted by someone in the debian-multimedia team?
Kind regards,
Arnout
However, things have changed a bit. The objections with the encoders can
be adressed in the same way as in ffmpeg, so IMO it should make no
problem to introduce mencoder into debian proper, under the provision
that the same encoder policy as in ffmpeg is applied to mplayer as well.
I'm
30 matches
Mail list logo
