On 09 Nov, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote :
> > So, if you want a recent ffmpeg with VLC, you need 3.0.
>
> Is there an estimated release date for VLC 3.0?
In a month or two, for freeze.
With my kindest regards,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734
Sent from m
4e05f944ad98859ab3fb1c0ddf36ac887bc
>
> J-B, are these all the necessary commits? Could they be applied to 2.2 branch?
No, there are more of those, IIRC, and some are runtime issues and it's
difficult
to plug correctly those in 2.2 branch.
So, if you want a recent ffmpeg with VLC, you
reassign 731699 libdvdread4
thanks
Hello,
This is a libdvdread issue.
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:59:34 +0100 xiscu wrote:
I've updated to jessie now and VLC 2.1.2 Rincedwind hasn't that problem
(now using also gnome flashback).
Thanks!
xiscu
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.j
ead: Encrypted DVD support unavailable.
>
> ** **
> ** No css library available. See **
> ** /usr/share/doc/libdvdread4/README.css **
> ** for more information.
I think that you could also do a symbolic link between libdvdnavmini and
libdvdnav.
I have no idea why people did this stupid dvdnavmini: the size of the
library is not big and so is the symbols list size.
With my kindest regards,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704
st/000222.html
> >
> > [libdvdnav] [branch: refs/tags/5.0.1]
> > Tag:916101a1ec4b50d929cb1fd5729764f4b1a1657e
> >> http://git.videolan.org/gitweb.cgi/libdvdnav.git?a=tag;h=916101a1ec4b50d929cb1fd5729764f4b1a1657e
> >
> > Tagger: Jean-Baptiste Kempf
> > Date:
On 18 Aug, Sebastian Ramacher wrote :
> On 2014-08-18 14:33:21, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > Le 18/08/2014 13:37, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> > >On 2014-08-17 23:22:02, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> > >>On 16 Aug, Reinhard Tartler wrote :
> > >>>I
Le 18/08/2014 13:37, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
On 2014-08-17 23:22:02, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
On 16 Aug, Reinhard Tartler wrote :
I believe that upstream doesn't care that much about this, because
I remember the idea.
Basically, the idea was to split so that servers using VLC
e a -pre2, we can proceed with uploading to unstable, I guess.
At your orders:
ftp://ftp.videolan.org/pub/videolan/testing/vlc-2.2.0-pre2/
With my kindest regards,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734
Sent from my Electronic Device
__
ng like:
- libvlccore
- libvlc
- vlc-core-plugins
- vlc
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734
Sent from my Electronic Device
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
ht
ems to depend on SDL, and
therefore on libX11 (and probably libXext).
With my kindest regards,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734
Sent from my Electronic Device
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multime
The SONAME bump is done on the vlc-2.2.git.
-pre2 is coming...
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734
Sent from my Electronic Device
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.
l with
> determining this. J-B, I'd like you to confirm if I'm right here.
I personnaly do not care, and think you could drop those splits.
If libavcodec depends on X11, having a vlc-noX without libavcodec is of
limited usage.
With my kindest regards,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http:
his should probably be forwarded to upstream.
>
> I totally agree.
>
> J-B, do you have any opinion on this issue?
I would build with --disable-libtar.
This feature is not supported on the other platforms anyway...
With my kindest regards,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkemp
ke it.
The API should stay compatible as much as possible, since most of the
fixes should happen under the hood.
With my best regards,
Le 02/13/14 17:18, Bálint Réczey a écrit :
Dear Jean-Baptiste and DVDnav developers,
We applaud your efforts in contributing to libdvdnav. Having
libdvdnav'
quot;
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/NewInWheezy
Baptiste
--- svn.debian.org/manuals/release-notes/en/whats-new.dbk 2013-03-31 11:24:24.0 +0200
+++ travail/manuals/release-notes/en/whats-new.dbk 2013-03-31 15:13:09.0 +0200
@@ -232,6 +232,16 @@
mail client.
+
+
+&debian; &releasen
should go there.
But also new features can enter there, as 1.1.1 can show...
Those branches aren't 'small fixes' and 'security' only.
Best Regards,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/
___
pkg-multimedia-
ry time-wise.
>
> I guess 1.0-bugfix and 1.1-bugfix branches do exist, yes? What's the
> problem?
You don't understand him. He is speaking about 1.1.0-bugfix,
1.1.1-bugfix, etc...
Best Regards,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/
18 matches
Mail list logo
