Hi James,
> Please mention that you added yourself to
> the list of uploaders in the changelog, then run dch -r, and then I'll
> upload it for you.
Thanks! That's done:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/xwax.git/commit/?id=19a0c911580a23b3aeefd446408cac3695f00516
Cheers!
Daniel
Hi Jaromír,
> 1) I would add d/source/local-options file
James Cowgill advised this was not required, I have no clue either way :-)
> 2) Fix d/watch file to handle beta and rc releases correctly
> ardour's watch file can be helpful
Thanks, this format works for me:
Hi Mattia, hi Jaromír,
>> I am enabling parallel build simply in d/rules file:
>> dh $@ --parallel
Thanks, I've done that in:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/xwax.git/commit/?id=289ae2aec2cf2abbb2f8b39231b5a1a2cb91895a
> The level of parallelism is decided by the buildd
Hi Jaromír,
> I didn't noticed any
> performance degradation.
Thanks, that's good to know. I've enabled all hardening options in
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/xwax.git/commit/?id=0fb08b94d5a4a66ab44c580c8b16c1197c8be510
> And also no user complained.
That may not be proof of
Hi Bálint,
> Do you have some good tests/results for measuring the performance differences?
This is tricky, it would require benchmarking the app with various
potential configurations. That's why I'm wondering about enabling an
option which might have an impact I don't know about.
> I'm
Hi Jaromír,
> 1. Bump of standards version
> 3. Use cgit for Vcs-Browser would be probably better.
> 4. Is d/dir file needed ?
Thanks for the review! I have pushed the above changes in
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/xwax.git/commit/?id=b26871620a6f5187d73907a684774477324f0045
>
Hi Jaromír, hi all,
> Or maybe the best ... asking upstream if he could name his releases
> with ~ as - breaking our automatic system for watching new releases.
I talked to the upstream author, he had not intended beta releases to be
packaged by downstream distros.
Anyway, the patch from Debian
Hi Jaromír, hi James,
> Or maybe the best ... asking upstream if he could name his releases
> with ~ as - breaking our automatic system for watching new releases.
I don't think that's very likely in this case, as the 1.6-beta2 tag was
made a while ago. It might be better to handle this
Hi Jaromír,
>> looks like named orig source as 1.6-beta2-1 instead of 1.6~beta2-1
>> > (-/~) which cause problem when building with --pristine-tar
Yes, that was probably my fault, the upstream release name is 1.6-beta2.
> How did you get orig tarball? ... I guess that you download it
> manually
Hi Jaromír,
> Just hint urgency=medium is default now and "UNRELEASED" instead of
> "unstable" should be set before uploading.
Thanks for the tip, I've updated the changelog.
Cheers!
Daniel
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
Hi James,
> Assuming you want to continue maintaining this package, you should
> revert these changelog changes and instead add yourself to the list of
> Uploaders.
Thanks for taking a look :-)
I've added myself to Uploaders and updated the changelog, as I found one
other issue in the
Hi Felipe, hi Jaromír,
> Welcome on board ;)
Thanks! I have pushed some updates to
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/xwax.git/ which are ready
for review. I did not push a debian/1.6_beta2* tag yet.
I have built the updated package in a clean jessie amd64 chroot using
Hi all,
I'd like to help update the xwax package in Debian to the latest
upstream 1.6-beta2, which Ubuntu already has. Then I would like to
backport this new version to jessie-backports, as jessie currently has
xwax version 1.5.
There appears to be a typo in the current patch for Debian
This ticket should be for Icecast 2.4.2 now, due to the security issue
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782120
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Sebastian,
I don't mind this bug being closed if you think it isn't worth fixing.
Just for the record, this is not an artefact of packages.debian.org -
taking a look at the debian/control file for the binary vlc-nox package
in sid, you can see that...
1. dependencies are listed on
Thanks for the explanation!
Daniel
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Package: vlc-nox
Version: 2.1.2-2+b1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Looking at the very long list of dependencies for vlc-nox:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/vlc-nox
I noticed there is a dependency on libavcodec53 or libavcodec54. However
many of the same dependencies are listed for both
Package: silan
Version: 0.2.0+20121230.gitb1d80bcc8d-1
Severity: normal
Hello Debian Multimedia Maintainers,
Could the Silan package in sid be updated to upstream's 0.3.2 please?
There are many useful fixes:
http://rg42.org/gitweb/?p=silan.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.3.2
Airtime
18 matches
Mail list logo
