Re: Libav 0.7 FTBFS on mipsel: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips2 (mips2) `ldl $2, 7($13)'

2011-07-24 Thread David Kuehling
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:33:42 (CEST), Philipp Kern wrote: On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:59:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:52:45PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: I think that's a misconfiguration of the buildds. They're supposed to put linux32 into the schroot

Re: Libav 0.7 FTBFS on mipsel: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips2 (mips2) `ldl $2, 7($13)'

2011-07-24 Thread David Kuehling
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 05:39:20PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: [..] Maybe the really correct, and right way to fix that, though, is to patch the configure script to check for the ABI used by $CC instead of 'uname -m'. That kind of fix could then also go upstream. Normally you pass

Re: Libav 0.7 FTBFS on mipsel: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips2 (mips2) `ldl $2, 7($13)'

2011-07-19 Thread David Kuehling
On 07/17/2011 01:14 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: cOn Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 12:36:23 (CEST), David Kuehling wrote: [..] Grepping over a copy of the ffmpeg sources, I find ldl in inline-assembler fragments in various files, such as intreadwrite.h. These are #ifdefed checking for ARCH_MIPS64

Re: Libav 0.7 FTBFS on mipsel: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips2 (mips2) `ldl $2, 7($13)'

2011-07-17 Thread David Kuehling
Reinhard == Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de writes: Hi, I've noticed that Libav FTBFS on mipsel in experimental. The buildlog looks like this: /tmp/ccztZJXP.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccztZJXP.s:334: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips2 (mips2) `ldl $2,7($13)' [..]