Hi guys,
I'm new to the list but joined to see if I could help with
the {j,tsch}ack{1,2,3} issue. :-)
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:37:45PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
jackd2 shouldn't be considered the successor of jackd1, but an alternative
imple
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
stop right here.
the library and the daemon are tied together.
the protocol between jackd and libjack is NOT fixed.
(basically i consider it a mistake to even have libjack and jackd in
different packages) but it might make sense to have that.
The
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
When you register with libjack, it will start the daemon if it is not
already running. So, you can't have the library without the daemon.[*]
That sounds like trouble: if such application is invoked inside a chroot, it
causes a mess!
Debian man
Hi Jonas,
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Let me then adjust and refine my proposal (main point is the same):
[snip]
It was suggested to discuss the introduction of the virtual libjack-0.116.0
on d-devel. I consider that unnecessary as it is coordinated only amongst 3
packag
Hi guys,
I'm new to the details of deb packaging... so I may be
replying to the wrong snippets... but:
Package: libjack-jackd2-0
Provides: libjack-0.116.0
Conflicts: libjack0
Yes, something like that.
4. Release jackd1 to experimental, with libjack0 providing virtual
package libja
Hi Jonas,
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[3] Going backwards has never been promised, though. A
program compiled against 0.118.0 will work with 0.34.0.
However, the use of weak symbols for new features may
make this available.
Isn't it exactly "going backwards" if jac
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 02:32:45PM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
[1] http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/SuggestedPackagingApproach
Note that this is a wiki and the suggestions come from only one person.
True, but Nedko (the author of
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 02:39:16AM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
We instantly switch to jackd2. End of the story.
Thanks for a clear cut message.
I can accept that.
For Squeeze, I'm OK with this, too.
-gabriel
_
Hi Jonas,
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I notice, though, that above links only mention API, not ABI. Is it safe to
expect library ABI (runtime linkage) to be frozen too if its API (compile
time interface) is?
I'm sure that the answer is "yes," but I've asked the
upstream d
Davis
To: Gabriel M. Beddingfield
Cc: Jack-Devel
Subject: Re: [Jack-Devel] packaging jack - details on "plan B" (fwd)
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield
wrote:
Jack Devs:
Please see the below e-mail (from debian packaging list) where Jonas would
like a cla
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield
wrote:
ABI back-compatibility has never been assured - if a program was linked
against JACK API M.N.m and the runtime installation is a version earlier
than that, there may be problems
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Stefan Bischoff wrote:
"Mixer reports a segmentation fault
mixer crashed
something bad happened and IDJC could not continue"
Unfortunately, if /anything/ crashes in idjcmixer... you get
this same error message. So, some manner of backtrace is
really necc. in order to i
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Javier Kohen wrote:
Version 1.9.5~dfsg-13 broke several application. Fmit
fails because it can't resolve a certain symbol. Mass
The symbol is jack_error_callback.[1] It appears that they
do indeed define the symbol,[2] so I'm not sure why it
doesn't get exported in the
Hi,
On Sat, 29 May 2010, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
I want to join the Debian Multimedia Package Maintainers Team. (whatever
it's called) My alioth username is alexandrequessy-guest.
I also see that you are familiar with jack. The most pressing question
is to if we do want to enable users t
On Sat, 29 May 2010, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2010-April/009046.html
That contained Adrian putting his foot down to stop the debate and say:
"we switch to jackd2 now". No one disagreed.
But, he went on to say we could th
Hi guys,
Does Debian have any sort of policy about when there should
and should not be a -dbg package?
As an upstream author, I personally prefer having -dbg
packages for all packages.
Thanks,
Gabriel
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Uh, rtkit? Is that something else then Rtirq
http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/107
Yes, it is something else.
RtKit is pulseaudio's solution to giving normal users
RT-priviledge. It is not specific to an -rt kernel.
RTIRQ, on the other hand, i
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, rosea.grammostola wrote:
RtKit is pulseaudio's solution to giving normal users RT-priviledge. It is
not specific to an -rt kernel.
RT via pulseaudio? Hmm ok.
No, RT via DBUS.
It's not directly related to pulseaudio, but it was created
to solve some of PA's problems
Hi Arnout,
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 11:44:42 am Arnout Engelen
wrote:
> I started on packaging stretchplayer (ITP 605256) - which
> was fairly easy because upstream (Gabriel M.
> Beddingfield) already had an ubuntu package ready.
Thank you!
> W: stretchplayer source:
>
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 12:49:44 pm Paul Tagliamonte
wrote:
> >> There was an odd license on it, too, iirc.
> >
> > Looks like it's regular GPLv2+ now
>
> Cool. I remember reading something about a stipulation of
> using it with Jesus or something like that. That might
> have just been the
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
But no, CDBS is not out of fashion, if that is what you implied above.
Sorry, wasn't trying to spread FUD. :-) Roughly 10 out of
the last 10 packages from 'sid' that I've looked at are DH 7
with a Quilt format... so I thought perhaps that was
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Arnout Engelen wrote:
I should, of course, send this manpage to Gabriel so he can include it in the
upstream package - haven't gotten around to that yet though.
I grabbed it from your git. I'll add it upstream.
Thank you!
-gabriel
___
On Monday, January 10, 2011 10:22:27 pm george germain
wrote:
> libffado2
> version: 2.0.99+svn1924-1
>
> maybe send a tarball or link 2 one?
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libf/libffado/
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimed
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
In the file manager Thunar, Hydrogen is presented as a handler for SVG files.
Is this caused by the line
MimeType=text/xml;
in /usr/share/applications/hydrogen.desktop ?
Perhaps SVG is a subset of XML? So, in claiming to handle XML, Hydr
The build type "RelWithoutDebInfo" does not exist. It should be
"RelWithDebInfo".
---
debian/changelog |6 +-
debian/rules |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 7d56460..67d50fc 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
25 matches
Mail list logo
