Bug#859793: fluidsynth: Package has infringed GPL

2017-04-14 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
El dl 10 de 04 de 2017 a les 23:06 +0200, Peter Hanappe va escriure: > However, it seems that chorus.c is now under the LGPL license. From > https://sourceforge.net/p/sox/code/ci/master/tree/COPYING: As I understand, fluidsynth_chorus.c was imported from SoX rather than the original project by

Bug#859793: fluidsynth: Package has infringed GPL

2017-04-10 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
El dl 10 de 04 de 2017 a les 09:24 +0200, David Henningsson va escriure: > What makes things slightly easier for us as upstream is that FluidSynth > is released under LGPL rather than GPL. LGPL allows linking to custom > licenses. This is not the case because fluid_chorus.c is part of the

Bug#859793: fluidsynth: Package has infringed GPL

2017-04-09 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
Dear Chris Bagwell, In 1999, you imported src/chorus.c to SoX on SourceForge.[6] File is copyrighted by Juergen Mueller and sundry contributors. Could you tell us where we could find the original project or how to contact Juergen Mueller? Thank you. -- [6]

Bug#859793: fluidsynth: Package has infringed GPL

2017-04-07 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
Regarding SoX and Debian bug #92969, the copyright handling in wav.c is dubious.[5] Assuming this modification is allowed, wav.c changes the notice XAnim Copyright (C) 1990-1997 by Mark Podlipec. [...] This software may be freely copied, modified and redistributed

Bug#859793: fluidsynth: Package has infringed GPL

2017-04-07 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
El dv 07 de 04 de 2017 a les 19:13 +0100, James Cowgill va escriure: > FYI the license in question is the SoX license which has been in Debian > and basically all distributions for 20 years (as part of SoX)... So SoX and derivatives are affected too. The problem was not detected.[3] > The SoX

Bug#859793: fluidsynth: Package has infringed GPL

2017-04-07 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
Source: fluidsynth Version: 1.1.6-4 Severity: wishlist fluid_chorus.c is under a custom license, granting the following: This source code is freely redistributable and may be used for any purpose. The license does not grant the right to modify the software. Therefore, it is not

Bug#850179: libgig-dev: ISO C++11 compliance

2017-01-04 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
compilation with Clang on C++11 mode. Author: Javier Serrano Polo <jav...@jasp.net> Index: libgig-3.3.0/src/gig.h === --- libgig-3.3.0.orig/src/gig.h 2015-08-04 23:22:14.0 + +++ libgig-3.3.0/src/gig.h 2017-01-04 17:52:46.000

Bug#835589: libjack-jackd2-0: libjack-0.116 is not equivalent to libjack-jackd2-0

2016-08-27 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
Package: libjack-jackd2-0 Version: 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 libsoundio1 Control: retitle -2 libsoundio1: Missing hard dependency on libjack-jackd2-0 Control: found -2 1.0.2-1 libsoundio1 depends on

Bug#826110: swh-plugins, vocoder-ladspa: error when trying to install together

2016-06-02 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
Control: reassing -1 vocoder-ladspa Control: affects -1 swh-plugins I will ask to upload a new version of lmms to remove vocoder-ladspa. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Bug#824211: marked as pending

2016-05-31 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
El dt 31 de 05 de 2016 a les 14:09 +, Jaromír Mikeš va escriure: > + * Fix multi-arch path. Will the plug-ins be installed under /usr/lib/*/ladspa? I would be in favor, but AFAIK this would be the first Debian package to ship LADSPA plug-ins under a multiarch folder instead of

Bug#824211: swh-plugins: Package new upstream version

2016-05-19 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
El dj 19 de 05 de 2016 a les 19:41 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš va escriure: > Yes, that would be definitely possible, but I would to to know where > next releases will be published to tune watch file accordingly. Nine years have passed without a release. I think a watch file is obsolete. I would rely on

Bug#824211: swh-plugins: Package new upstream version

2016-05-13 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
Package: swh-plugins Version: 0.4.15+1-8 Severity: wishlist The upstream project is maintained at https://github.com/swh/ladspa . It includes a vocoder plug-in that is shipped with the lmms package. To reuse this plug-in, lmms could put it under /usr/lib/ladspa, but that would conflict with a new

Bug#823561: zynaddsubfx: License should be GPL-2+

2016-05-05 Thread Javier Serrano Polo
Package: zynaddsubfx Version: 2.5.2-2 Severity: wishlist According to https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/2752#issuecomment-217043740 , it looks like the license should be GPL-2+ despite what individual files say. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature