Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

2012-03-02 Thread Roman Haefeli
1:46 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > Hi all > > I uploaded the pd-pdstring package to git.debian.org. It's a Pd library > that eases the manipulation of strings in Pd by converting between Pd > messages and lists of bytes. > > The package uses short-form dh. > > http:/

Bug#661805: Classes [unpackOSCstream] and [packOSCstream] are broken

2012-03-01 Thread Roman Haefeli
Package: pd-osc Version: 0.1-1 Severity: normal The mentioned classes are broken due to the lack of the classes [slipenc] and [slipdec]. There is no package in Debian yet, that provides those classes. A suggested fix is to create a pd-slip package containing those classes and make pd-osc depend

Re: request sponsor for / upload of pd-pdstring

2011-12-02 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 20:00 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:53, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > If time allows, > > Finally some time... :/ > > > could you also have a look at pd-pdstring? It's been > > waiting for some time a

Re: request sponsor for / upload of pd-flite

2011-11-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:02 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 19:16, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 21:33 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> Please mark the package as ready for release by updating debian/changelog. > > > > Done so.

Re: request sponsor for / upload of pd-flite

2011-11-08 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 21:33 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 17:51, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > I wasn't able to verify that but it certainly doesn't hurt. I replaced > > the spaces by dashes. > > config/missing still has spaces... Oops. Than

Re: request sponsor for / upload of pd-flite

2011-11-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Felipe Thanks for your remarks. On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 23:18 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:52, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > I uploaded the pd-flite package to git.debian.org > > Some comments: > > The README.Debian should be signed by a real

request sponsor for / upload of pd-flite

2011-11-02 Thread Roman Haefeli
I uploaded the pd-flite package to git.debian.org. It contains a Pd external for text-to-speech synthesis based on the flite implementation. The package uses short-form dh. It's quite a small package. I'd be very happy if someone could have a look at it and eventually upload it. Many thanks in a

Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

2011-10-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 14:11 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > All the issue below have been fixed or do not belong to the package in > question. > > I'd be grateful if someone could have a look again and eventually upload > it. > > Cheers > Roman > > > &g

Re: RFS pd-zexy (was Re: pd-zexy review)

2011-10-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:43 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > to my knowledge i have fixed all the remaining issues of the "pd-zexy" > package. > The packages includes a lintian override statement: # the upstream library format includes the license file in it, this library # has a unique

Re: RFS pd-zexy (was Re: pd-zexy review)

2011-10-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:43 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > to my knowledge i have fixed all the remaining issues of the "pd-zexy" > package. Shouldn't pd-zexy depend only on puredata-core instead of puredata? Or is there a particular reason that it wants full puredata? Roman _

Re: where is Pd's "-stdlib"? (was Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring)

2011-10-04 Thread Roman Haefeli
> another slight problem with the "-stdpath" and "-stdlib" flags for > > declare (and probably this also expands to the "-nostdpath" startup > > flag). following is an excerpt of the discussion in the debian > > packaging > > team: > > > &g

Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

2011-10-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
All the issue below have been fixed or do not belong to the package in question. I'd be grateful if someone could have a look again and eventually upload it. Cheers Roman On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 16:19 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > Hi IOhannes > > First of all, thanks a lot for

Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

2011-10-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 12:07 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote > On 2011-10-03 11:50, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > > I noticed that only the package 'puredata' provides the virtual package > > 'pd', but 'puredata-core' does not. > > this is u

Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

2011-10-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:24 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > debian/control: > Depends on "pd",but there "pd" is only a virtual package, and you > should provide a real one first. > this is also caught by lintian: > W: pd-pdstring: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends > depends:

Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

2011-10-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 14:11 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 17:02 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > i'm not entirely sure though (given the nastiness of [declare]) > > if you think that it is a bug in "puredata-core", please file a bugreport.

Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

2011-10-02 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 12:16 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > I find that Launchpad is a good place to test new packages. Can you also use it to test against Debian releases? If yes, how? > I think > you have a launchpad account already, so it should be easy. I always > upload my pack

Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

2011-10-01 Thread Roman Haefeli
wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/30/2011 04:19 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:24 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > >> debian/control: > >> any reason why you are so picky about the debhelper version? &

Re: request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

2011-09-30 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi IOhannes First of all, thanks a lot for having such a thorough look. On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:24 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: [...] > debian/control: > current standards-version is 3.9.2 fixed > debian/control: > Uploaders field has a stray trailing comma oops... fixed. > debian/cont

request sponsor/upload for pd-pdstring

2011-09-30 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all I uploaded the pd-pdstring package to git.debian.org. It's a Pd library that eases the manipulation of strings in Pd by converting between Pd messages and lists of bytes. The package uses short-form dh. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643837 http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-

Re: new package pd-readanysf

2011-01-18 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all Now since gmerlin-avdecoder is in 'New', I think pd-readanysf is ready for upload, too. If anyone wants to have a look? BTW: It uses short-form dh. Roman ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.deb

Re: Comments regarding pd-arraysize_0.1-1_amd64.changes

2010-11-08 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 14:00 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Nov 5, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > I'm interested to hear other opinions on this. > pd-arraysize is a special case, not an example of how to do things. > There are plenty of simple pack

Re: Comments regarding pd-arraysize_0.1-1_amd64.changes

2010-11-05 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 19:10 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 00:51, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > As for packaging pd-arraysize together with other things, as far as I > > know, it is not Debian practice to lump together different upstream > > projects into a single packa

Re: Comments regarding pd-arraysize_0.1-1_amd64.changes

2010-11-05 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 10:11 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:41:19AM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > >On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 00:10 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> On 2010-11-04 22:51, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> > >> > Usage

Re: Comments regarding pd-arraysize_0.1-1_amd64.changes

2010-11-05 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 00:10 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2010-11-04 22:51, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > > Usage in a helpfile does not really warrant a Depends relation. > > Recommends or Suggests are better. > > i couldn't have said this better. > > (esp. in this very case, where the hel

Re: Comments regarding pd-arraysize_0.1-1_amd64.changes

2010-11-04 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:03 +, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi, > > quoting from your debian/copyright: > License: This code is too trivial to have a licence or copyright. > > Is it really necessary to distribute it in a standalone source package? Yeah, I also think that this is questionable.

Re: four more pd packages

2010-10-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 00:57 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Sep 13, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 09:28 +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner >> > wrote: > >>> pd-bassemu > >>> pd-earplu

Re: new package pd-readanysf

2010-10-07 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 20:12 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 17:32:10 (CEST), Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > I uploaded a new package pd-readanysf, which is a Pd external object for > > reading and receiving many audio form

new package pd-readanysf

2010-10-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all I uploaded a new package pd-readanysf, which is a Pd external object for reading and receiving many audio formats. ITP-Bug: #598388 I'd be happy if someone could have a look. Roman ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-

Re: first package: pd-wiimote

2010-09-28 Thread Roman Haefeli
+0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > Hi all > > I guess that all issues with the pd-wiimote package have been resolved. > Do you think it can be uploaded? > > Many thanks > Roman > > ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Re: first package: pd-wiimote

2010-09-14 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all I guess that all issues with the pd-wiimote package have been resolved. Do you think it can be uploaded? Many thanks Roman ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debia

Re: [SCM] pd-wiimote/master: added 'pd' as Depends: and formatted one-dep-per-line

2010-09-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 18:05 +, eighthave-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > The following commit has been merged in the master branch: > commit b8e8dcd45d28ecd349def4d2eb85e443f85980d8 > Author: Hans-Christoph Steiner > Date: Mon Sep 13 14:05:07 2010 -0400 > > added 'pd' as Depends:

Re: first package: pd-wiimote

2010-09-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 18:29 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 05:43:32PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > >On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 17:22 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > >> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:13 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> > On 02/09/10

Re: first package: pd-wiimote

2010-09-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 17:22 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:13 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 02/09/10 05:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > > >>> So another ap

Re: first package: pd-wiimote

2010-09-02 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:13 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/09/10 05:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > >>> So another approach would be to repackage the > >>> tarball to just include the COPYING file. While we are at it, we could > >>> als

Re: first package: pd-wiimote

2010-09-02 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 10:48 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:38:56AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >Packagingwise, I think it is fine, but I'm umcomfortable with the two > >patches. First, please use the patch metadata as described in > >http://dep.debian.net/deps/de

Re: first package: pd-wiimote

2010-09-02 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 09:38 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:16:03 (CEST), Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > I checked in my first package. I tried to follow - where possible - very > > closely to pd-motex, which has been already up

Re: first package: pd-wiimote

2010-09-02 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 01:07 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > Looks pretty good to me, but I'm just learning myself :) Thanks for having a look. One thing I like to mention: The upstream sources come with a Makefile based on a apparently old Makefile template for libdirs. It was pretty broken

first package: pd-wiimote

2010-09-01 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all I checked in my first package. I tried to follow - where possible - very closely to pd-motex, which has been already uploaded. I would be glad if someone could have a look at it. FYI: It is using what I believe is called short-form dh. Cheers Roman

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-29 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 14:44 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > > Also it seems as if dh_shlibdeps looks only for .so-files. I haven't > > figured out what trickery was used in the gem package to let it find > > also .pd_linux-files. But having a plain .pd-linux file in the temporary > > d

Re: request for membership, ITA

2010-08-28 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 19:11 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 26/08/10 14:39, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 14:22 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > >> When that's done, you have write access to our Git area at Alioth: then > >> please up

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-28 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 19:24 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 27/08/10 18:18, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:11 +0200, IOhannes zmölnig wrote: > >> On 08/24/2010 12:55 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:25:12AM +0

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:11 +0200, IOhannes zmölnig wrote: > On 08/24/2010 12:55 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:25:12AM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > > Hmm. Do we then perhaps need to beware of this for helper tools like > > lintian and dh_shlibdeps? > > > the

Re: request for membership, ITA

2010-08-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Romain On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 10:32 -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote: > I have always wanted to look at PD more closely I think it is definitely worth it. I'll be glad to help, if you need it. > and I also packaged cwiid, > which I suspect is a dependency of this package. Indeed, it is. > Theref

Re: request for membership, ITA

2010-08-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
). OTOH, pd-zexy which is included for a long while now also talks about "objects". So I happily adopt your suggestion, since it somehow seems already established. (OTOH, pd-motex talks about "externals" again) hm.. Roman > On Aug 25, 2010, at 7:30 AM, Roman Haefeli

Re: request for membership, ITA

2010-08-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 14:22 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > When that's done, you have write access to our Git area at Alioth: then > please upload your packaging there and let us[1] look at it together. Thanks for your help. Am I supposed to have already access to git.debian.org/git/pkg-multim

Re: request for membership, ITA

2010-08-27 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 14:22 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Please read http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia - and especially > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/Join :-) > > When that's done, you have write access to our Git area at Alioth: then > please upload your packaging ther

request for membership, ITA

2010-08-25 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all Following IOhannes m zmoelnig and Hans-Christoph Steiner (both subscribed to this list and both now members of the pkg-mutlimedia team) I would like to join the forces to bring some Pure Data related packages into Debian and to help with the maintenance of those. I hope to do this in favour