Hi James,
On 04/08/2017 04:27 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
I don't think I misunderstood, I just don't know much about hydrogen or
composite. Obviously the GUIs look almost identical, and I think it
would be better to drop composite if users can be switched to hydrogen
with no loss in functionality.
Hi Gabriel,
Thanks for taking the time to chime in here. I really appreciate your
open and clear statement about the status of the project. It helps me a
lot here, since many seem not to get where I come from with this issue,
which, by the way, was a recommendation on IRC #debian-next and not
On 04/08/2017 04:09 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Yes it is statistic
Are you joking!!! I am pro_audio user by profession you think that
pro_audio users are so silly!!! You can't be serious!
I still don't understand what scary you?
Having Hydrogen and Composite in archive together is totally harml
Thanks for your thoughts on this, James, but let me reply on this clearly:
On 04/08/2017 01:35 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
If the functionality provided by composite is now in hydrogen or
elsewhere then maybe composite can be removed on the basis that it's
obsolete and has little upstream activity,
Hello Jonas,
well there is maybe a language barrier causing this?
On 04/08/2017 01:26 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please bring up that question at debian-devel mailinglist - this
bugreport is the wrong place for that.
That was not another issue report. It was a rhetorical statement to
explai
