Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-19 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote: Added patch to fix hardening ... pls review. It looks like most patches were only necesary because the makefile does not respect the environment. I have instead made it respect the environment, and it should be OK now.

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-15 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2013/6/15 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com 2013/6/15 Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com I've tried fix hardening on it's own but didn't succeeded yet. Anybody is welcome to fix it better way now or in next upload. The problem is that h-w diverts gcc and friends. Whick makes it

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-15 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Yes it does. Am 15.06.2013 00:44 schrieb Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Reinhard Tartler

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:36 PM, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 27b3130d6ea719a3470c2d9a8f552657cb3d72c5 Author: Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz Date: Fri Jun 14 00:45:12 2013 +0200 Dont sign tags Why did

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Alessio Treglia
On 14 June 2013 14:58, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: Why did you do this? Tags are better signed Better in which sense? -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: On 14 June 2013 14:58, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: Why did you do this? Tags are better signed Better in which sense? In that then we know who tagged the release. I find that valuable. -- Saludos,

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Alessio Treglia
On 14 June 2013 16:52, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: In that then we know who tagged the release. I find that valuable. I've been guessing it is quite unnecessary as tags are being logged along with information on the author of the commit. That's why adding the GPG signature does not

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Felipe Sateler
BTW, I can't find the commit mail, but why did you add a build-dep on hardening-wrapper? Shouldn't we make the package do the hardening on its own? I think the idea was to deprecate h-w at some point. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: On 14 June 2013 16:52, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: In that then we know who tagged the release. I find that valuable. I've been guessing it is quite unnecessary as tags are being logged along with

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:36 PM, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 27b3130d6ea719a3470c2d9a8f552657cb3d72c5 Author: Jaromír Mikeš

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:36 PM, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:36 PM, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Sorry ... I send it directly by accident. 2013/6/15 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com 2013/6/14 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org BTW, I can't find the commit mail, but why did you add a build-dep on hardening-wrapper? Shouldn't we make the package do the hardening on its own? I think

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Jun 14, 2013 7:47 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry ... I send it directly by accident. 2013/6/15 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com 2013/6/14 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org BTW, I can't find the commit mail, but why did you add a build-dep on

Re: [SCM] ladspa-sdk/master: Dont sign tags

2013-06-14 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2013/6/15 Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com I've tried fix hardening on it's own but didn't succeeded yet. Anybody is welcome to fix it better way now or in next upload. The problem is that h-w diverts gcc and friends. Whick makes it annoying to build stuff that is not to be hardened.