On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:43, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 22.02.2011 08:49, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>>
>> Makes sense,
>
> and so it's done ;)
In csound, I number patches according to the following scheme:
0xxx: Patches taken from upstream development
1xxx: Patches interesting for upstream (
Am 22.02.2011 08:49, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Makes sense,
and so it's done ;)
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:30:14 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 21.02.2011 17:21, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> I'd suggest to drop them. the order is defined by debian/patches/series
>> anyway
>
> Generally I agree with you. But for the sake of the smallest possible
> debdiff with the version
Am 21.02.2011 17:21, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I'd suggest to drop them. the order is defined by debian/patches/series
anyway
Generally I agree with you. But for the sake of the smallest possible
debdiff with the version currently in stable, I think I should keep
the numbering of the present
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 16:47:38 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 21.02.2011 16:37, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> the numbering looks very weird. Fabian, is that on purpose? perhaps we
>> should remove the numbers from the filenames before the next upload?
>
> Yes, I admit it's weird. No, it's n
Am 21.02.2011 16:37, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
the numbering looks very weird. Fabian, is that on purpose? perhaps we
should remove the numbers from the filenames before the next upload?
Yes, I admit it's weird. No, it's not on purpose. ;)
It is because each time I backported a patch from upst
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 15:25:48 (CET), fabian-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
> diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
> index f086ba3..8e6f538 100644
> --- a/debian/patches/series
> +++ b/debian/patches/series
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> 0001-Remove-unneeded-bswap.h-from-publi
