Re: Bug#548642: transition: liblo

2010-03-24 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt h...@ftwca.de writes: Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com writes: As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and schedule binNMUs? Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead. It's now

Re: Bug#548642: transition: liblo

2010-03-01 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com writes: As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and schedule binNMUs? Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead. Marc -- BOFH #271: The kernel license has expired

Re: Bug#548642: transition: liblo

2010-03-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:05:23AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com writes: As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and schedule binNMUs? Yes, I guess so.

Re: Bug#548642: transition: liblo

2010-03-01 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 06:22, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:05:23AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com writes: As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we