Le Fri 11 Dec 09 à 23:59 +0100, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Yes, removal definitely makes sense; this is a dead project upstream.
> > I think a company might be maintaining a fork, but I doubt anybody
> > still uses vls nor anybody could support it at thi
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Yes, removal definitely makes sense; this is a dead project upstream.
> I think a company might be maintaining a fork, but I doubt anybody
> still uses vls nor anybody could support it at this point.
Surprisingly, there was a release in 2008 after 4 y
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> popcon doesn't look too bright either:
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=vls
> Sounds like a good removal candidate to me.
> Loic, you seem to be the last uploader of the package. What do you
> think, shall we ask for vls to be removed?
Yes,
Christophe Mutricy writes:
> Hello,
>
> Le Fri 11 Dec 09 à 09:43 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
>> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
>> amd64.
>>
>> > /build/user-vls_0.5.4+cvs20031028-9-amd64-FRkR6D/vls-0.5.4+cvs20031028/src/core/parsers.cpp:125:
>> > un
Hello,
Le Fri 11 Dec 09 à 09:43 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> > /build/user-vls_0.5.4+cvs20031028-9-amd64-FRkR6D/vls-0.5.4+cvs20031028/src/core/parsers.cpp:125:
> > undefined reference to `C_Vector::C_Vecto
Source: vls
Version: 0.5.4+cvs20031028-9
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091210 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -g -O2 -Wall -O2 -o vls vls-appl
