Your message dated Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:24:48 +0100
with message-id <20110303132448.gk15...@ltw.loris.tv>
and subject line armel builds now fine
has caused the Debian Bug report #580975,
regarding jack-audio-connection-kit sometimes FTBFS on some armel buildds with 
illegal instruction error
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
580975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580975
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: jack-audio-connection kit
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
x-debbugs-cc: ar...@buildd.debian.org

note: i'm not sure what severity this deserves. If it's a really a bug in the package it's probablly rc OTOH it could just be something screwy with the buildd chroots and not really be a bug in the package at all. I am therefore leaving the judgement call on severity up to the maintainer.

Attempts to build jack-audio-connection-kit on all6500-2 and muscat seem to be failing with an illegal instruction error.

https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=jack-audio-connection-kit&ver=1.9.5~dfsg-9&arch=armel&stamp=1273219333&file=log
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=jack-audio-connection-kit&ver=1.9.5~dfsg-9&arch=armel&stamp=1273213323&file=log
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=jack-audio-connection-kit&ver=1.9.5~dfsg-13&arch=armel&stamp=1273406338&file=log
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=jack-audio-connection-kit&ver=1.9.5~dfsg-13&arch=armel&stamp=1273430446&file=log
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=jack-audio-connection-kit&ver=1.9.5~dfsg-13&arch=armel&stamp=1273432641&file=log

Other armel buildds and my qemu armel system seem to be building it successfully (or for older versions running into 580618).

Can anyone reproduce this problem outside a buildd environment? Does anyone have any ideas as to what may be the cause?



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!


This bug seemed to be a temporary hiccup on some armel buildds.
According to 

   
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=jackd2;ver=1.9.6~dfsg.1-5;arch=armel;stamp=1296327641

the package builds correctly "now".


Cheers

-- 
mail: a...@thur.de      http://adi.thur.de      PGP/GPG: key via keyserver


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to