On 09/05/13 23:27, Adam M. Costello wrote:
> Fabian Greffrath :
>
>> Is fdk-aac finally the first *free* high-quality AAC encoder or is it
>> just the next *non-free* one after FAAC?
>
> From what I've read, FAAC is not a high-quality AAC encoder. As far as
> I know, fdk-aac is the only high-qua
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez writes:
> On 09/05/13 23:27, Adam M. Costello wrote:
>> Fabian Greffrath :
>> Of course, the library would be much more useful if avconv could use it.
>> If libfdk-aac is GPL-incompatible, what does that imply? That avconv
>> must not require libfdk-aac to be present a
On 10/05/13 07:41, Arto Jantunen wrote:
> The difference between the GPL and the LGPL does solve the problem if
> the program you are developing wants to link to both LGPL licensed and
> GPL incompatible libraries, assuming that the license of the program
> itself is not either GPL or LGPL. Parts o
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez writes:
> On 10/05/13 07:41, Arto Jantunen wrote:
>> The difference between the GPL and the LGPL does solve the problem if
>> the program you are developing wants to link to both LGPL licensed and
>> GPL incompatible libraries, assuming that the license of the program
>
Quoting Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez (2013-05-10 13:28:20)
> On 10/05/13 07:41, Arto Jantunen wrote:
> > The difference between the GPL and the LGPL does solve the problem
> > if the program you are developing wants to link to both LGPL
> > licensed and GPL incompatible libraries, assuming that the
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
wrote:
> On 10/05/13 07:41, Arto Jantunen wrote:
>> The difference between the GPL and the LGPL does solve the problem if
>> the program you are developing wants to link to both LGPL licensed and
>> GPL incompatible libraries, assuming th
