Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 732159 RM: mplayer - RoM - unmaintained, RC-buggy, alternatives exist
Bug #732159 [mplayer] Should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to 'RM: mplayer - RoM - unmaintained, RC-buggy, alternatives
exist' from 'Should this package be
retitle 732159 RM: mplayer - RoM - unmaintained, RC-buggy, alternatives exist
reassign 732159 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:16:59PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> > Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
> >> >
> >> > - Last upload nearly t
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:24:01AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> TBH, I'm a bit confused about your reply.
I probably lost track of the point I was trying to make.
I so far assumed that this issue was, bluntly put, about
almost exclusively
1) MPlayer does not work against Libav
But what you wr
TBH, I'm a bit confused about your reply.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Reimar Döffinger
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:25:08PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Reimar Döffinger
>> wrote:
>> > What would constitute a constructive comment?
>>
>> Ideally
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:25:08PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Reimar Döffinger
> wrote:
> > What would constitute a constructive comment?
>
> Ideally "I am interested in making mplayer work against the libavcodec
> that we have in Debian, and this is my wor
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Reimar Döffinger
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:16:59PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> In lack of any *constructive* comments about this, I would say yes,
>> let's remove them.
>
> What would constitute a constructive comment?
Ideally "I am interested in
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:16:59PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:07:36PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff
> >> wrote:
> >> > Package: mplayer
> >> >
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:07:36PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> > Package: mplayer
>> > Severity: serious
>> >
>> > Should this package be removed? If so, please reassig
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:07:36PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Package: mplayer
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
> >
> > - Last upload nearly two years ago
> >
Hi ,
The option "-demuxer lavf" works ! Thanks a lot!
Please close the bug report #731937.
2014/1/8 Xiangyu Liu
> Hi ,
>
> The option "-demuxer lavf" works ! Thanks a lot!
> Please close the bug report #731937.
>
> By the way, When I met problem in #731937, I have read the manual of
> mpl
On 29.12.2013 06:04, Xiangyu Liu wrote:
For some specific MKV files, mplayer2 has problem to sync A/V, but
mplayer works fine. I've filed a bug.
( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731937 )
MPlayer and MPlayer2 use different Matroska demuxers by default. Try
passing both "-demu
Hi,
For some specific MKV files, mplayer2 has problem to sync A/V, but mplayer
works fine. I've filed a bug.
( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731937 )
If possible, please keep the mplayer in Debian. Gentoo has new upstream
versions of Mplayer (1.1.1, and 1.2_pre20130729) that ca
2013/12/15 Reimar Döffinger :
> On 14.12.2013, at 23:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>> On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: mplayer
Severity: serious
Should this package be removed? If
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:53 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Well, to be honest, I think the problem is actually libav, not mplayer.
> Most users prefer the original ffmpeg over libav from my own experience.
>
Agreed
Furthermore, I still do not understand
On 14.12.2013, at 23:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>> Package: mplayer
>>> Severity: serious
>>>
>>> Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
>
On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> Package: mplayer
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
>>
>> - Last upload nearly two years ago
>> - FTBFS for a long time
>
I've added debian-devel for further input, as I believe the
consequences are a bit wider than expected.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: mplayer
> Severity: serious
>
> Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
>
> - Last upload
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
>
> - Last upload nearly two years ago
> - FTBFS for a long time
> - Incompatible with current libav
> - Alternatives exist (mplayer2, mpv)
I definitely agree.
BT
Package: mplayer
Severity: serious
Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
- Last upload nearly two years ago
- FTBFS for a long time
- Incompatible with current libav
- Alternatives exist (mplayer2, mpv)
Cheers,
Moritz
__
19 matches
Mail list logo
