On 2015-02-12 00:41:43, peter green wrote:
> On 12/02/15 00:29, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >Hi Peter,
> >
> >Rasbperry Pi 2 has now been released and, if I read the news correctly,
> >it supports NEON instructions. Should we revert the changes or do they
> >need any modifications?
> That is a ques
On 12/02/15 00:29, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Hi Peter,
Rasbperry Pi 2 has now been released and, if I read the news correctly,
it supports NEON instructions. Should we revert the changes or do they
need any modifications?
That is a question that will need some experimentation/testing to ans
Hi Peter,
Rasbperry Pi 2 has now been released and, if I read the news correctly,
it supports NEON instructions. Should we revert the changes or do they
need any modifications?
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
I've applied your patch, tweaked it to use --derives-from rather than --is
implemented this change, written a changelog entry (which may be more
verbose than actually needed, feel free to cut it down if you want when
bringing the change into Debian) and am now running a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #738760 [src:libav] libav: Add proper raspberry pi CPU detection
Added tag(s) pending.
--
738760: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738760
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
_
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2015-01-07 07:22:43, peter green wrote:
> Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >
> >Thank you for the explanation. What about the attached patch? [1]
> >
> >I've looked through the code and the only place where
> >--enable-runtime-cpudetect
> >makes a difference is on powerpc
On January 6, 2015 8:16:51 AM EST, Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
>Control: tags -1 + patch
>
>Hi Peter
>
>On 2015-01-03 22:36:13, peter green wrote:
>> Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> >there was a request to change the handling of the Raspberry Pi in
>the
>> >libav package. Could you please explain th
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi Peter
On 2015-01-03 22:36:13, peter green wrote:
> Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >there was a request to change the handling of the Raspberry Pi in the
> >libav package. Could you please explain the changes applied to the
> >Raspbian version?
> In raspbian we have a chec
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #738760 [src:libav] libav: Add proper raspberry pi CPU detection
Added tag(s) patch.
--
738760: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738760
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
_
Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
there was a request to change the handling of the Raspberry Pi in the
libav package. Could you please explain the changes applied to the
Raspbian version?
In raspbian we have a checker that runs after all our autobuilds (and I
manually run a similar check when I do man
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2014-09-26 13:12:42, Janne Grunau wrote:
> On 2014-09-05 00:17:15 +0200, Florian Will wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please note that I'm not the bug submitter.
> >
> > > Can you provide a patch, please?
> >
> > As of now, I can't. :/ I don't have the hardware to reproduce
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #738760 [src:libav] libav: Add proper raspberry pi CPU detection
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
738760: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738760
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
_
On 2014-09-05 00:17:15 +0200, Florian Will wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please note that I'm not the bug submitter.
>
> > Can you provide a patch, please?
>
> As of now, I can't. :/ I don't have the hardware to reproduce this or to
> verify the correctness of a patch.
>
> So I can only give a few hints abo
Hi,
Please note that I'm not the bug submitter.
> Can you provide a patch, please?
As of now, I can't. :/ I don't have the hardware to reproduce this or to
verify the correctness of a patch.
So I can only give a few hints about the background of this bug report.
Anyone not planning to come up w
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Michal Lazo wrote:
> Source: libav
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> Current libav debian build script don't detect raspberry pi CPU properly
> and detect CPU with ARM NEON future
>
> Raspbian maintainer patch it with simply comment line with NEON
> But
Source: libav
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Current libav debian build script don't detect raspberry pi CPU properly
and detect CPU with ARM NEON future
Raspbian maintainer patch it with simply comment line with NEON
But I think you can do it much better and raspbian distro will be able t
16 matches
Mail list logo
