On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 06:08:53AM +0200, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> Yes, as I said in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=9;bug=765547
> we have, and Fons had agreed to change it (but I don't know what's
> become of it).
I remember this was discussed and I agreed that the propert
> Aha it looks like conversation has been scattered in many bugs ;)
I know, but I was asked to report a bug for each package separately.
(Actually, there may be more, I only checked the ones I've actually
used ...)
> Just to be extra sure e.g. amb-plugins file ambisonic0_if.cc contains
> several
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Frank Heckenbach
Komu: 760...@bugs.debian.org, mira.mi...@seznam.cz
Datum: 10. 9. 2015 6:43:38
Předmět: Re: Bug#760758: amb-plugins: spurious LADSPA_PROPERTY_REALTIME
"> Is there any progress with this topic? Does any body contacted Richard
Fur
Hi,
> Is there any progress with this topic? Does any body contacted Richard Furse
> as has been suggested?
Yes, as I said in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=9;bug=765547
we have, and Fons had agreed to change it (but I don't know what's
become of it).
Regards,
Frank
On 09/09/2015 06:40 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any progress with this topic? Does any body contacted Richard Furse
> as has been suggested?
i have now.
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2015-September/036096.html
gcmsr
IOhannes
signature.asc
Descrip
Hi all,
Is there any progress with this topic? Does any body contacted Richard Furse
as has been suggested?
best regards
mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.or
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:50:05AM +0200, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>
> > LADSPA_PROPERTY_REALTIME indicates that the plugin itself *has* a
> > realtime dependency. That would be the case only for few plugins,
> > not really audio processing plugins, more plugins for I/O.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:50:05AM +0200, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> As I said, it's a bit confusing, since two rather different
> properties include the word "realtime", and confusion about what the
> plugin itself may do vs. what the user of the plugin (the host) may
> do (and the use of the pas
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:00:15AM +0200, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>
> > > > The same seems to apply to vco-plugins, mcp-plugins and rev-plugins.
> > > > Should I submit separate bug reports for each package?
>
> See ladspa.h:
>
> /* Property LADSPA_PROPERTY_REALTIME in
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:00:15AM +0200, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> > > The same seems to apply to vco-plugins, mcp-plugins and rev-plugins.
> > > Should I submit separate bug reports for each package?
See ladspa.h:
/* Property LADSPA_PROPERTY_REALTIME indicates that the plugin has a
real-ti
Hi,
> > The same seems to apply to vco-plugins, mcp-plugins and rev-plugins.
> > Should I submit separate bug reports for each package?
>
> Yes please.
Done.
(Also wah-plugins and fil-plugins which I had overlooked last time
because I didn't have them installed.)
> We'll fix it in Debian as so
Hi,
Thanks for your report. I'm CC'ing Fons for his convenience.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Frank Heckenbach
wrote:
> Package: amb-plugins
> Version: 0.8.1-3
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
>
> The LADSPA_Descriptor's of all the plugins contain
> LADSPA_PROPERTY_REALTIME which is unneed
Package: amb-plugins
Version: 0.8.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
The LADSPA_Descriptor's of all the plugins contain
LADSPA_PROPERTY_REALTIME which is unneeded AFAICS.
This may be confusion with LADSPA_PROPERTY_HARD_RT_CAPABLE
(I agree the naming is a bit unfortunate ;).
However, as ladspa.h
13 matches
Mail list logo
