On Thursday 13 August 2015 17:59:25 Justin B Rye wrote:
Software seems the obvious solution, but in this particular context
it feels slightly less natural - something like:
This package downloads the sourcecode for ${PKGM} from ${UPSTREAM},
compiles it into binary deb package
Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Justin B Rye wrote:
Software seems the obvious solution, but in this particular context
it feels slightly less natural - something like:
This package downloads the sourcecode for ${PKGM} from ${UPSTREAM},
compiles it into binary deb package format, and
Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
This package downloads the sourcecode for ${PKGM} from ${UPSTREAM},
compiles it into binary deb package format, and installs the output
(${PKGM_ALL}).
I like the use of word software but I do not like word output in this
context.
Software seems the obvious
On Wednesday 12 August 2015 17:00:43 Justin B Rye wrote:
Put it this way: not many debconf reviews end with the maintainers
insisting they're legally obliged to keep secret the first thing users
are going to want to know about the package!
I'm not happy about it too but unfortunately there are
Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for
the libdvd-pkg source package.
This review will last from Wednesday, August 12, 2015 to Saturday, August 22,
2015.
Please send reviews as unified diffs (diff -u) against the original
files. Comments about your
Christian PERRIER wrote:
--- libdvd-pkg.old/debian/templates 2015-07-29 08:18:35.980914897 +0200
+++ libdvd-pkg/debian/templates 2015-08-08 08:24:38.242456340 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Type: note
_Description:
This package downloads the ${PKGG} source files from videolan.org,
-
