Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-09 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Eric Beuque] > Hi, > > Thanks for your modifications. > > i'm starting to cleanup the stream database. I already remove a hundred of > invalid stream, to get the most working stream as possible but since there > is more than 4000 streams it will takes some times to review all. Yeah. With such

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-09 Thread Eric Beuque
2016-06-09 9:51 GMT+02:00 Petter Reinholdtsen : > [Eric Beuque] > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for your modifications. > > > > i'm starting to cleanup the stream database. I already remove a hundred > of > > invalid stream, to get the most working stream as possible but since > there > >

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-09 Thread Eric Beuque
Hi, Thanks for your modifications. i'm starting to cleanup the stream database. I already remove a hundred of invalid stream, to get the most working stream as possible but since there is more than 4000 streams it will takes some times to review all. 2016-06-09 7:28 GMT+02:00 Petter

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-08 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Ryan Kavanagh] > I've fixed a bunch of lintian warnings and other small things. Operating > on the assumption that the database of streams will be brought to > date/cleaned up, I'll upload the package after giving it a final look > over with fresh eyes tomorrow. Very good. It work for me in

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-08 Thread Ryan Kavanagh
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 07:27:07PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Eric Beuque] > > For the database, all stream have to be cleaned from > > http://database.freetuxtv.net/. I don't have enough time to do it > > but i will try to do it. > > I did not quite understand what you mean. The

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-07 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Eric Beuque] > Hi, > > i saw that freetuxtv_0.6.8~dfsg1.orig.tar.gz have been commited the same > day of your message. Does it fix the problem? Yes. > For the database, all stream have to be cleaned from > http://database.freetuxtv.net/. I don't have enough time to do it but i > will try to do

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-07 Thread Eric Beuque
Hi, i saw that freetuxtv_0.6.8~dfsg1.orig.tar.gz have been commited the same day of your message. Does it fix the problem? For the database, all stream have to be cleaned from http://database.freetuxtv.net/. I don't have enough time to do it but i will try to do it. 2016-06-02 11:25 GMT+02:00

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-02 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Eric Beuque] > Hi, we are updating upstream package in debian, just waiting for some > review before to send it to debian repository. > > It will be soon avaliable. Very good. I had a look and cleaned up some issues. The most annoying issue left is that 'gbp buildpackage' do not work because

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-01 Thread Eric Beuque
Hi, we are updating upstream package in debian, just waiting for some review before to send it to debian repository. It will be soon avaliable. 2016-06-01 23:13 GMT+02:00 Petter Reinholdtsen : > When deciding if the package should be kept or not, it might be useful to > note

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-06-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
When deciding if the package should be kept or not, it might be useful to note that there is recent developments in the new upstream git repository mentioned in bug #813192. In other words, the upstream developer is still active, even if no update has been done to the Debian package since 2014.

Bug#822494: Time to remove? Unusable since 2014.

2016-04-24 Thread Ryan Kavanagh
Package: freetuxtv Version: 0.6.6~dfsg1-1 Severity: grave Justification: Package RC-buggy (x2) and completely unusable since 2014 [ Follow-up to discussion in #debian-multimedia. ] This package has been RC-buggy since 2014 (bugs #772845, #787351). In particular, it is completely unusable: it