Bug#825993: Rosegarden is not proposed when opening .rg files

2016-06-02 Thread Debian/GNU
On 2016-06-01 10:34, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I agree that the approach has some disadvantage, and the one you quotes > is the major one, but I believe it is less of a disadvantage for > unskilled users than having Rosegarden fail to show up as an alternative > when he is trying to open a

Bug#825993: Rosegarden is not proposed when opening .rg files

2016-06-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Sebastian Ramacher] > No, please don't. Please get file fixed to report the correct mimetype > instead. I'm not convinced that is possible. I've asked about this in http://bugs.debian.org/825994 >. Do you agree that it should be possible to click (or double click) on a Rosegarden file in the

Bug#825993: Rosegarden is not proposed when opening .rg files

2016-06-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi On 2016-06-01 10:01:24, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Package: rosegarden > Version: 1:16.02-1 > Tags: patch > > When saving a file in Rosegarden, and then trying to use the KDE file > manager to open the file, Rosegarden is not listed as an option for > opening the file. The reason as far

Bug#825993: Rosegarden is not proposed when opening .rg files

2016-06-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: rosegarden Version: 1:16.02-1 Tags: patch When saving a file in Rosegarden, and then trying to use the KDE file manager to open the file, Rosegarden is not listed as an option for opening the file. The reason as far as I understand it is that the MIME type for the file as reported by