Re: RFS pd-zexy (was Re: pd-zexy review)

2011-10-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-10-10 21:02, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:43 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> >> to my knowledge i have fixed all the remaining issues of the "pd-zexy" >> package. >> > > The packages includes a lintian override state

Re: RFS pd-zexy (was Re: pd-zexy review)

2011-10-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-10-10 20:30, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:43 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> to my knowledge i have fixed all the remaining issues of the "pd-zexy" >> package. > > Shouldn't pd-zexy depend only on puredata-core inste

Re: RFS pd-zexy (was Re: pd-zexy review)

2011-10-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:43 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > to my knowledge i have fixed all the remaining issues of the "pd-zexy" > package. > The packages includes a lintian override statement: # the upstream library format includes the license file in it, this library # has a unique

Re: RFS pd-zexy (was Re: pd-zexy review)

2011-10-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 17:43 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > to my knowledge i have fixed all the remaining issues of the "pd-zexy" > package. Shouldn't pd-zexy depend only on puredata-core instead of puredata? Or is there a particular reason that it wants full puredata? Roman _

RFS pd-zexy (was Re: pd-zexy review)

2011-10-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 to my knowledge i have fixed all the remaining issues of the "pd-zexy" package. given that the new upload would fix an RC-critical bug, i would very much appreciate it, if some DD could upload this package for me. fgmasdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGN