Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg

2015-07-23 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2015-07-23 17:09, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: On 23.07.2015 17:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2015-07-23 16:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2015-07-23 15:49, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: By the way, do you know why vtk6 is shown as bad in the transition tracker, even though it built successfully wit

Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg

2015-07-23 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
On 23.07.2015 17:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2015-07-23 16:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> On 2015-07-23 15:49, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>> By the way, do you know why vtk6 is shown as bad in the transition tracker, >>> even though it built successfully with ffmpeg? >> >> Because building succes

Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg

2015-07-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2015-07-23 15:49, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: By the way, do you know why vtk6 is shown as bad in the transition tracker, even though it built successfully with ffmpeg? Because building successfully doesn't mean building sanely. Package: libvtk6.1 Source: vtk6 (6.1.0+dfsg2-6) Version: 6.1.0+d

Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg

2015-07-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2015-07-23 16:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2015-07-23 15:49, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: By the way, do you know why vtk6 is shown as bad in the transition tracker, even though it built successfully with ffmpeg? Because building successfully doesn't mean building sanely. Package: libvtk6.1

Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg

2015-07-23 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Jonathan, On 23.07.2015 16:18, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Thanks. sflphone also seems rather unhappy; could you take a look at that too > please? That's caused by bug #787390 [1], which has a working patch. (I mentioned this in the initial mail [2].) By the way, do you know why vtk6 is show

Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg

2015-07-23 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2015-07-21 16:54, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: Unfortunately, three more packages fail to build: * avbin: #793131 * dvbcut: #793089 * gazebo: #792992 The first two fail, because the libav* headers are now installed in the multi-arch locations. (For whatever reason, my build chroot contained a

Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg

2015-07-21 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi, On 20.07.2015 16:46, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > It has been uploaded and built on most architectures (still Needs-Build on > mips and s390x). It now built on those two, as well. Unfortunately, three more packages fail to build: * avbin: #793131 * dvbcut: #793089 * gazebo: #792992 The fir

Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg

2015-07-20 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi Jonathan, On 18.07.2015 12:50, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:08:10PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> A ben file can be found at the end of the mail. >> Please set up a transition tracker and let me know, when the upload to >> unstable c

Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg

2015-07-17 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Hi, On 17.07.2015 08:57, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> (The command line tools transition is not required to happen in lock step, >> because the transitional package libav-tools-links can satisfy the >> dependencies, until the packages are updated.) > > and from the wiki p

Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg

2015-07-16 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo Hi, On 17.07.2015 00:29, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:08:10PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team decided to switch from Libav >> to FFmpeg [1]. Thus please remove the testing migration block of ffmpeg. >

Re: Bug#792619: transition: ffmpeg

2015-07-16 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ffmpeg-libav.html Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:08:10PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team decided to switch from Libav > to FFmpeg [1]. Thus please remove the testing mig