Hi!
Yesterday, somebody digged out Suse's announcement of our coordinated
distro approach for switching to jackd2.
A lot has happened during the past hours on the mailing lists and via
IRC.
Basically, the jackd1 camp isn't really happy. And some people think we
should really provide a choice
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:37:45PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
jackd2 shouldn't be considered the successor of jackd1, but an
alternative implementation.
Wauw!
Please post a URL to some (more official) summary of the dispute if
available somewhere.
So what do we have?
jackd1 -- stable,
Hi guys,
I'm new to the list but joined to see if I could help with
the {j,tsch}ack{1,2,3} issue. :-)
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:37:45PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
jackd2 shouldn't be considered the successor of jackd1, but an alternative
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:37:45 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
Yesterday, somebody digged out Suse's announcement of our coordinated
distro approach for switching to jackd2.
A lot has happened during the past hours on the mailing lists and via
IRC.
Basically, the jackd1 camp isn't really
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:17:46PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:37:45 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
Yesterday, somebody digged out Suse's announcement of our coordinated
distro approach for switching to jackd2.
A lot has happened during the past hours on the
