Hi,
|--== On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 15:56:24 +0200, Adrian Knoth
a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de said:
[...]
AK What I've seen in the team so far: make it work. Besides this, there are
AK no to few rules.
AK We don't have a please beginners policy.
Totally. The only strong points we have as team
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 08:50:06PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
Hi,
|--== On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 15:56:24 +0200, Adrian Knoth
|--== a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de said:
[...]
AK What I've seen in the team so far: make it work. Besides this,
AK there are no to few rules.
AK We don't have a
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 22:26:06 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
So I seriously mean it when I wrote earlier that I appreciate you
challenging me, Reinhard. I could use some more challenges on the
usability front.
You're welcome, and I'll do so ;-)
Please continue to raise questions about
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 01:03:45AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
It seems to me that upstream use SVN, not Git. Is that correct?
And how could the packaging version be 1.9.5+svn3977 when apparently the
newest SVN commit in upstream trunk is r3968?!?
3977 was the revision shown by svn info
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 12:54:16PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 01:03:45AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
It seems to me that upstream use SVN, not Git. Is that correct?
And how could the packaging version be 1.9.5+svn3977 when apparently
the newest SVN commit in
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 01:33:48PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
It seems to me that upstream use SVN, not Git. Is that correct?
And how could the packaging version be 1.9.5+svn3977 when apparently
the newest SVN commit in upstream trunk is r3968?!?
3977 was the revision shown by svn
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 01:49:33PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 01:33:48PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
It seems to me that upstream use SVN, not Git. Is that correct?
And how could the packaging version be 1.9.5+svn3977 when
apparently the newest SVN commit in
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 01:57:44PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Above means that you did in fact track the standard public accessible
trunk branch, and the most recent commit to that branch was not 3978 but
3968 - that other number is simply the global counter of the SVN
repository.
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:37:28PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 01:57:44PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Above means that you did in fact track the standard public accessible
trunk branch, and the most recent commit to that branch was not 3978
but 3968 - that other
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:30:21AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi!
Is it ok with you that I repackage from the current vcs-tarball to
pristine-(or-repackaged)-tarball + vcs-patch?
I'm not sure if I'm qualified to give an answer that respects all
implications of this question. I also
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 23:00:18 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
Different approach: make us the jackd2 repository. ;) So we simply use
git, wildly patch whatever we want, no need to wait for upstream to
apply my patches and pull from their svn repo from time to time. ;)
This way, we can ship
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 09:16:26PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 23:00:18 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
Different approach: make us the jackd2 repository. ;) So we simply
use git, wildly patch whatever we want, no need to wait for upstream
to apply my patches and pull
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:30:21AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:00:18PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:53:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
In short: I would very much like to volunteer to repackage the
current vcs-tarball as
Hi!
Ok guys, I've fixed the ffado portnaming issue and I also provided the
manpages, in other words, the jackd2 package is now ready to be uploaded
to *unstable*.
Cheerio
--
mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:44:21PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
Ok guys, I've fixed the ffado portnaming issue and I also provided the
manpages, in other words, the jackd2 package is now ready to be
uploaded to *unstable*.
New release uses waf as build system.
That's fine in itself, but
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:53:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Using the separately packaged waf version 1.5.10 fails to locate expat
and libsamplerate (and possibly other system libraries).
Though I don't know waf, I just figured it out, and like always, it's
completely non-obvious:
-
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:00:18PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
-conf.env.append_unique('CXXFLAGS', '-O3 -Wall')
-conf.env.append_unique('CCFLAGS', '-O3 -Wall')
+conf.env.append_unique('CXXFLAGS', -O3)
+conf.env.append_unique('CCFLAGS', -O3)
This makes it work, at least until
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:53:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
New release uses waf as build system.
So, after perhaps 3hrs of hacking, I now have a patch that enables the
use of system-wide waf. Find attached.
However, the system-wide waf is going to be removed from Debian:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:00:18PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:53:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
In short: I would very much like to volunteer to repackage the
current vcs-tarball as pristine-tarball + vcs-patch. Is that
acceptable?
Different approach: make
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:27:33AM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:53:19PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
New release uses waf as build system.
So, after perhaps 3hrs of hacking, I now have a patch that enables the
use of system-wide waf. Find attached.
Great work!
20 matches
Mail list logo
