Am 12.11.2010 08:09, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I'd suggest to wait for lame to be ACCEPTED or REJECTED. ftp-master
seems to consider it unredistributable licensewise. Or port the pd-libs
Is this because of the two extra clauses that Andres mentioned? IMHO
they do only add more freedom (clause
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:07:49 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 12.11.2010 08:09, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I'd suggest to wait for lame to be ACCEPTED or REJECTED. ftp-master
seems to consider it unredistributable licensewise. Or port the pd-libs
Is this because of the two extra clauses
Anyone know the story behind the 'lame' package in the NEW queue? will
it get included? did the patent stuff change? I'd like to package some
stuff that depends on it.
.hc
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
On Thursday 11 November 2010 19:05:51 Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Anyone know the story behind the 'lame' package in the NEW queue? will
it get included? did the patent stuff change? I'd like to package some
stuff that depends on it.
I haven't heard anything new related to lame. There's
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 05:26:31 (CET), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Nov 11, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Andres Mejia wrote:
On Thursday 11 November 2010 19:05:51 Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Anyone know the story behind the 'lame' package in the NEW queue?
will it get included? did the patent
