Re: musescore_2.1.0+dfsg1-0.2~bpo9+1_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-09-07 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > I think you're confused ;-) apparently, yes, I missed the "backports" part. ;) Thanks for taking care of musescore! Cheers, - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Re: musescore_2.1.0+dfsg1-0.2~bpo9+1_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-09-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Fabian, >if you had to go through NEW anyway, why didn't you consider to I think you’re confused ;-) This is backports-NEW, not unstable-NEW. I uploaded 2.1 to stretch-backports as discussed in the MuseScore IRC channel, and tvaz agreed I can comaintain this. >separate the SF3 soundfont out

Re: musescore_2.1.0+dfsg1-0.2~bpo9+1_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-09-06 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Hi Thorsten, Am Mittwoch, den 06.09.2017, 17:54 + schrieb Debian FTP Masters: > binary:musescore is NEW. > binary:musescore-common is NEW. > binary:musescore-common is NEW. > binary:musescore-dbgsym is NEW. > binary:musescore is NEW. > source:musescore is NEW. if you had to go through NEW

musescore_2.1.0+dfsg1-0.2~bpo9+1_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-09-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:musescore is NEW. binary:musescore-common is NEW. binary:musescore-common is NEW. binary:musescore-dbgsym is NEW. binary:musescore is NEW. source:musescore is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was