On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:43 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On May 24, 2011, at 4:02 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 2011-05-23 00:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >>
> >> Would it make sense to also add the versions since
On May 24, 2011, at 4:02 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-05-23 00:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Would it make sense to also add the versions since it won't build
with
the 'puredata' package 0.43 or newer, something like:
puredata-d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-05-24 10:02, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2011-05-23 00:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> Also about puredata-core, it has a menu item set by puredata-core.menu.
>> That means that you could have puredata-core installed without the GU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-05-23 00:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Would it make sense to also add the versions since it won't build with
> the 'puredata' package 0.43 or newer, something like:
>
> puredata-dev | puredata << 0.43
i believe this is a bug in the
Would it make sense to also add the versions since it won't build with
the 'puredata' package 0.43 or newer, something like:
puredata-dev | puredata << 0.43
Also about puredata-core, it has a menu item set by puredata-
core.menu. That means that you could have puredata-core installed
wit
On May 11, 2011, at 4:55 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ola,
given that i have done most of the packaging, i guess i'll try to
answer
the question :-)
On 2011-05-09 06:19, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
There are a lot of changes, so I'm wond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ola,
given that i have done most of the packaging, i guess i'll try to answer
the question :-)
On 2011-05-09 06:19, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> There are a lot of changes, so I'm wondering if we could get a summary
> of what we should do to up
indeed, you can loosen the Build-depends to be:
puredata-dev | puredata | pd
Hth, piem
On 09/05/11 06:19, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> There are a lot of changes, so I'm wondering if we could get a summary
> of what we should do to update our packages, and whether there might be
> any pitf
There are a lot of changes, so I'm wondering if we could get a summary
of what we should do to update our packages, and whether there might
be any pitfalls. It seems that we should now build pd libs against
puredata-dev instead of puredata, for example.
.hc
On May 8, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Pa
Hi Hans,
I guess the 'git log' and debian/changelog are the best place to look
at. Any specific questions about these changes?
Cheers, piem
On 08/05/11 18:13, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Hey IOhannes and piem,
>
> I wonder if you could update us on all the changes to the puredata
> pack
Hey IOhannes and piem,
I wonder if you could update us on all the changes to the puredata
package setup, and what we need to do with our puredata-related
packages.
(There are 35+ puredata-related packages and 4+ pd devs in pkg-
multimedia, so it seemed a good venue).
.hc
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
