Hello,
I was just wondering if there is any plan to package the latest smplayer
version (0.7.0).
There has been two releases recently (0.6.10 end of December and 0.7.0 a few
days ago) that would probably fix pending bugs like #607187, that would be
great to check it.
Here's the list of changes
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was just wondering if there is any plan to package the latest smplayer
> version (0.7.0).
> There has been two releases recently (0.6.10 end of December and 0.7.0 a few
> days ago) that would probably fix pending bugs like #607187
Le vendredi 3 février 2012, vous avez écrit :
> Thanks for the list, but please rather file a wishlist bug (if it
> doesn't exist already) that requests the new upstream version to be
> packaged. This will reach this list as well and makes your request
> easier to find.
There are actually already
FYI: The status of the smplayer source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.6.9-4
Current version: 0.7.0-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv
On Thursday 16 February 2012 12:36:29 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the smplayer package:
>
> #655125: smplayer: new upstream release (0.6.10)
>
> It has been closed by Alessio Treglia .
>
> Their explana
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Shouldn't the Depends field be "mplayer | mplayer2" so that mplayer won't be
> installed if mplayer2 is
> already installed?
mplayer2 already provides mplayer.
> (Optionally mention in the Description that it's also a front-end for
