Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1041234 -moreinfo
Bug #1041234 [src:jpeg-xl] libjpegli62 should provide libjpeg62-turbo (=
1:2.0.2)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1041234: https://bugs.deb
Control: tags -1 - patch
Hi Jeremy Bícha,
> > I am currently talking with jpegli team to understand the need for
> > convenient copy of libjpeg-turbo during built process. We'll see how
> > much has changed in the build process since, but I suspect the patch
> > does not apply anymore. Or does it
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - patch
Bug #1041234 [src:jpeg-xl] libjpegli62 should provide libjpeg62-turbo (=
1:2.0.2)
Removed tag(s) patch.
--
1041234: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1041234
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:37 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> Jeremy,
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 8:15 PM Jeremy Bícha
> wrote:
> > The patch provided doesn't make sense to me.
> >
> > The binary packages mentioned do not exist in Debian.
> >
> > jpeg-xl is now at version 0.9.2 in Debian so if up
Jeremy,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 8:15 PM Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> The patch provided doesn't make sense to me.
>
> The binary packages mentioned do not exist in Debian.
>
> jpeg-xl is now at version 0.9.2 in Debian so if upgrading to a new
> version was your only request, we can close this bug.
I am
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
The patch provided doesn't make sense to me.
The binary packages mentioned do not exist in Debian.
jpeg-xl is now at version 0.9.2 in Debian so if upgrading to a new
version was your only request, we can close this bug.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Hi,
the attached patch would update the packaging to a new upstream snapshot
to also provide the headers in libjpegli62-dev and updates the provides
field for libjpegli62 as suggested.
Best regards,
Julian
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\- agains
Package: libjpegli62
Version: 0.9.0~git20230623.689da0f-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
looking at the list of symbols of libjpeg62-turbo (e.g. at [1]) and the
interface implemented in [2], jpeg_crop_scanline, jpeg_skip_scanlines,
jpeg_write_icc_profile and jpeg_read_icc_profile seem to be
im
