Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Pre-approval for next hugin upload?

Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (03/11/2008): > Ok; if it eats users' hard drives, it can be removed without worrying > about missing functionality, heh. Sure. :) In unstable with: ,-- | hugin (0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2) unstable; urgency=low | | * Update README.Debian to reflect the current sta

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#502104: marked as done (hugin-tools: Missing tca_correct)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#502104: fixed in hugin 0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #502104, regarding hugin-tools: Missing tca_correct to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

[Pkg-phototools-devel] hugin_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: hugin-data_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2_all.deb to pool/main/h/hugin/hugin-data_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2_all.deb hugin-tools_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/h/hugin/hugin-tools_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2_amd64.deb hugin_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2.diff.gz to pool/main/h/hugin/hugin_0.7.0~s

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Pre-approval for next hugin upload?

Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (04/11/2008): > Anyway, maybe some of you have comments on the current README.Debian > in the unstable branch of hugin.git? If that looks fine to you, I'll > push the tca_correct fix, and upload hugin to unstable, request the > unblock, and then we can move to 0.

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Processing of hugin_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2_amd64.changes

hugin_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: hugin_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2.dsc hugin_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2.diff.gz hugin_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2_amd64.deb hugin-tools_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2_amd64.deb hugin-data_0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2_all.deb