ted at home and well, I wouldn't say I understand why, but it works.
With the dfsg-4, none of the two assert warning I was mentioning occurs.
Danke schön !
--
Jérôme
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.al
Le 2015-03-02 20:25, Andreas Metzler a écrit :
> On 2015-03-02 Jérôme wrote:
> [...]
>> I didn't try to build from Debian sources at all, with or without patch.
>
> Hello,
>
> I have just uploaded 2014.0.0+dfsg-4 with the two patches added to
> experimental /av
Oh and BTW I just checked and Debian version doesn't work today either,
so the "leap year" / "March 1st" coincidence I mentionned in upstream
report was indeed a coincidence.
--
Jérôme
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing
ild from Debian sources at all, with or without patch.
--
Jérôme
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
2): assert "IsValid()" failed
in GetTm(): invalid wxDateTime ../include/wx/datetime.h(1740): assert
"IsValid()" failed in GetTicks(): invalid wxDateTime
You may also want to check my bug report upstream for other details.
--
Jérôme
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
