Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Pre-approval for next hugin upload?

2008-11-07 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Cyril Brulebois [Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:09:07 +0100]: > Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (03/11/2008): > > Ok; if it eats users' hard drives, it can be removed without worrying > > about missing functionality, heh. > Sure. :) > In unstable with: > ,-- > | hugin (0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2) unstable;

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Pre-approval for next hugin upload?

2008-11-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (03/11/2008): > Ok; if it eats users' hard drives, it can be removed without worrying > about missing functionality, heh. Sure. :) In unstable with: ,-- | hugin (0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2) unstable; urgency=low | | * Update README.Debian to reflect the current sta

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Pre-approval for next hugin upload?

2008-11-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (04/11/2008): > Anyway, maybe some of you have comments on the current README.Debian > in the unstable branch of hugin.git? If that looks fine to you, I'll > push the tca_correct fix, and upload hugin to unstable, request the > unblock, and then we can move to 0.

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Pre-approval for next hugin upload?

2008-11-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
(Dropping -release for now.) Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (03/11/2008): > I wonder whether it perhaps be possible to get the hugin 0.7.0 release > (instead of beta5) into lenny. Iirc the changes to beta5 are a not > that big, it was released rather quickly afterwards. I didn't check (the d

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Pre-approval for next hugin upload?

2008-11-03 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Cyril Brulebois [Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:28:27 +0100]: > Hi folks, > I'm wondering whether it'd be OK to fix #502104 in my next hugin upload > (the only other change being updating README.Debian to point to > pkg-phototools website, for more info about backports, etc.). That'd > mean adding a line

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Pre-approval for next hugin upload?

2008-11-03 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2008-11-03 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm wondering whether it'd be OK to fix #502104 in my next hugin upload > (the only other change being updating README.Debian to point to > pkg-phototools website, for more info about backports, etc.). That'd > mean adding a line (for a sin

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Pre-approval for next hugin upload?

2008-11-02 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi folks, I'm wondering whether it'd be OK to fix #502104 in my next hugin upload (the only other change being updating README.Debian to point to pkg-phototools website, for more info about backports, etc.). That'd mean adding a line (for a single binary) to debian/hugin-tools.install, for a tool