On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:48:37AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > If so that'd solve the apparent problem. It won't prevent
> > the following scenario though:
> >
> > - Jessie is released with PG 9.4.betaX
> > - PG releases 9.4.betaX+1 which requires a dump/restore
> > cycle due to a catalog
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:48:37AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > If so that'd solve the apparent problem. It won't prevent
> > the following scenario though:
> >
> > - Jessie is released with PG 9.4.betaX
> > - PG releases 9.4.betaX+1 which requires a dump/restore
> > cycle due to a catalog
Re: Karsten Hilbert 2014-10-27 <20141027094648.ga22...@hermes.hilbert.loc>
> If I understand this correctly you are saying that even
> though Jessie may be frozen with PG 9.4.betaX there will
> still be PG 9.4 packages entering Jessie no matter which
> point along the release schedule Jessie happen
Package: postgresql
Version: 9.4+163
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: 5.a)
Hi,
since it is now less than 10 days from Nov 5th and upstream hasn't
released PostgreSQL 9.4 just yet
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/release-9-4.html
I wonder what the rationale is for
