FYI: The status of the vagrant source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.2.19+dfsg-2
Current version: 2.2.19+dfsg-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the ruby-certificate-authority source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.0-2
Current version: 1.1.0-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1019634 1026565 1026601 1026544 1026560 1026578 1026564 1026557
> 1026550 1026589 1026629
Bug #1019634 [src:jekyll] jekyll requires liquid gem v4, whereas the archive
has 5.4
Bug #1026601 [src:jekyll] ruby-jekyll-feed: FTBFS: ERROR:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1026589 src:jekyll
Bug #1026589 [src:jekyll-theme-minima] jekyll-theme-minima: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby3.1" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in
`rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1026629 src:jekyll
Bug #1026629 [src:ruby-jekyll-commonmark] ruby-jekyll-commonmark: FTBFS: ERROR:
Test "ruby3.1" failed:
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in block in
activate_dependencies': Could
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1026550 src:jekyll
Bug #1026550 [src:ruby-jekyll-last-modified-at] ruby-jekyll-last-modified-at:
FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed:
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in block in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1026557 src:jekyll
Bug #1026557 [src:ruby-jekyll-toc] ruby-jekyll-toc: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby3.1" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in
`rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find 'liquid'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1026564 src:jekyll
Bug #1026564 [src:ruby-jekyll-polyglot] ruby-jekyll-polyglot: FTBFS: ERROR:
Test "ruby3.1" failed:
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in block in
activate_dependencies': Could not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1026560 src:jekyll
Bug #1026560 [src:ruby-jekyll-asciidoc] ruby-jekyll-asciidoc: FTBFS: ERROR:
Test "ruby3.1" failed:
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in block in
activate_dependencies': Could not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1026578 src:jekyll
Bug #1026578 [src:ruby-jekyll-include-cache] ruby-jekyll-include-cache: FTBFS:
ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed:
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in block in
activate_dependencies':
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1026565 src:jekyll
Bug #1026565 [src:ruby-jekyll-seo-tag] ruby-jekyll-seo-tag: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby3.1" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in
`rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1026601 src:jekyll
Bug #1026601 [src:ruby-jekyll-feed] ruby-jekyll-feed: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby3.1" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in
`rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1026544 src:jekyll
Bug #1026544 [src:ruby-jekyll-data] ruby-jekyll-data: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby3.1" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in
`rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1019634 src:jekyll
Bug #1019634 [jekyll] jekyll requires liquid gem v4, whereas the archive has 5.4
Bug reassigned from package 'jekyll' to 'src:jekyll'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1019634 to the same values
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 20:55:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1019673: fixed in ruby-uniform-notifier 1.16.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019673,
regarding ruby-uniform-notifier: FTBFS with ruby3.1: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1"
failed: Failure/Error: require
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 21:25:59 +0100
Source: ruby-uniform-notifier
Architecture: source
Version: 1.16.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 20:27:11 +0100
Source: ruby-libxml
Architecture: source
Version: 3.2.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
Changed-By:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1019634 ruby-jekyll-asciidoc ruby-jekyll-commonmark ruby-jekyll-data
> ruby-jekyll-feed ruby-jekyll-include-cache ruby-jekyll-last-modified-at
> ruby-jekyll-polyglot ruby-jekyll-remote-theme ruby-jekyll-seo-tag
> ruby-jekyll-toc
Bug
ruby-uniform-notifier_1.16.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-uniform-notifier_1.16.0-1.dsc
ruby-uniform-notifier_1.16.0.orig.tar.gz
ruby-uniform-notifier_1.16.0-1.debian.tar.xz
ruby-uniform-notifier_1.16.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1019634 1026565 1026601 1026544 1026560 1026578 1026564 1026557
> 1026550 1026589 1026629
Bug #1019634 [jekyll] jekyll requires liquid gem v4, whereas the archive has 5.4
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #1026565 is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1019634 jekyll requires liquid gem v4, whereas the archive has 5.4
Bug #1019634 [jekyll] ruby-jekyll-remote-theme: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0"
failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in
block in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1019634 jekyll
Bug #1019634 [src:ruby-jekyll-remote-theme] ruby-jekyll-remote-theme: FTBFS:
ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed:
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in block in
activate_dependencies': Could
ruby-libxml_3.2.4-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-libxml_3.2.4-1.dsc
ruby-libxml_3.2.4.orig.tar.gz
ruby-libxml_3.2.4-1.debian.tar.xz
ruby-libxml_3.2.4-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 20:14:18 +0100
Source: rerun
Architecture: source
Version: 0.13.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
Changed-By: Cédric
rerun_0.13.1-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rerun_0.13.1-3.dsc
rerun_0.13.1.orig.tar.gz
rerun_0.13.1-3.debian.tar.xz
rerun_0.13.1-3_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 18:22:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026897: fixed in ruby-tilt 2.0.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026897,
regarding ruby-tilt: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:56:42 -0300
Source: ruby-tilt
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1026897 [src:ruby-tilt] ruby-tilt: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1026897: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026897
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
ruby-tilt_2.0.11-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-tilt_2.0.11-2.dsc
ruby-tilt_2.0.11-2.debian.tar.xz
ruby-tilt_2.0.11-2_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-webpack-rails: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on
tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-voight-kampff: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on
tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-webpacker: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-sprockets-rails: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on
tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-sassc-rails: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-rails-controller-testing: FTBFS in bookworm (missing
build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-haml: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-joiner: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-pry-rails: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-invisible-captcha: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on
tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-omniauth-rails-csrf-protection: FTBFS in bookworm (missing
build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-globalid: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-factory-bot-rails: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on
tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-tzinfo: missing dependency on tzdata
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-enumerize: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-active-model-serializers: FTBFS in bookworm (missing
build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-browser: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-combustion: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-coffee-rails: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-ahoy-email: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 17:21:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026178: fixed in ruby-tzinfo 2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026178,
regarding ruby-arbre: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 13:39:57 -0300
Source: ruby-tzinfo
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
Changed-By:
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:03:27 -0300
Source: ruby-defaults
Architecture: source
Version: 1:3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
Changed-By:
ruby-defaults_3.1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-defaults_3.1.dsc
ruby-defaults_3.1.tar.xz
ruby-defaults_3.1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
ruby-tzinfo_2.0.5-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-tzinfo_2.0.5-1.dsc
ruby-tzinfo_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz
ruby-tzinfo_2.0.5-1.debian.tar.xz
ruby-tzinfo_2.0.5-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1026178 [ruby-tzinfo] ruby-tzinfo: missing dependency on tzdata
Bug #1026179 [ruby-tzinfo] ruby-active-model-serializers: FTBFS in bookworm
(missing build-depends on tzdata)
Bug #1026180 [ruby-tzinfo] ruby-ahoy-email: FTBFS in bookworm (missing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1026179 ruby-tzinfo
Bug #1026179 [src:ruby-active-model-serializers] ruby-active-model-serializers:
FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on tzdata)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ruby-active-model-serializers' to
'ruby-tzinfo'.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1026178 1026179 1026180 1026181 1026182 1026183 1026184 1026185
> 1026186 1026187 1026188 1026189 1026190 1026191 1026192 1026193 1026194
> 1026195 1026196 1026197 1026198
Bug #1026178 [ruby-tzinfo] ruby-tzinfo: missing dependency on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1026178 ruby-tzinfo: missing dependency on tzdata
Bug #1026178 [src:redmine] redmine: FTBFS in bookworm (missing build-depends on
tzdata)
Changed Bug title to 'ruby-tzinfo: missing dependency on tzdata' from 'redmine:
FTBFS in bookworm
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 15:43:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1025096: fixed in nanoc 4.12.14-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1025096,
regarding nanoc: FTBFS in bullseye, and will also FTBFS in bookworm next year
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 19:47:26 -0300
Source: ruby-haml
Architecture: source
Version: 6.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
Changed-By:
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 11:24:01 -0300
Source: nanoc
Architecture: source
Version: 4.12.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
Changed-By:
nanoc_4.12.14-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nanoc_4.12.14-1.dsc
nanoc_4.12.14.orig.tar.gz
nanoc_4.12.14-1.debian.tar.xz
nanoc_4.12.14-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
ruby-haml_6.1.1-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-haml_6.1.1-1.dsc
ruby-haml_6.1.1.orig.tar.gz
ruby-haml_6.1.1-1.debian.tar.xz
ruby-haml_6.1.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Source: ruby-tilt
Version: 2.0.11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
After updating ruby-haml to 6.1.1, ruby-tilt fails to build with a test
failure.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby3.1 /usr/bin/gem2deb-test-runner
>
>
Source: ruby-html2haml
Version: 2.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1413:in `rescue in block
Source: ruby-haml-rails
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
After updating ruby-haml to 6.1.1, ruby-haml-rails has unsatisfiable
build dependencies.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:52:19 +0530
Source: ruby-signet
Architecture: source
Version: 0.17.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
Changed-By:
Source: ruby-haml-contrib
Version: 1.0.0.1-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
After updaring ruby-haml to 6.6.1, ruby-haml-contrib fails to build with
a test failure.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: asciidoctor
Version: 2.0.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
I'm working on updating ruby-haml to the new upstream versinon 6.1.1,
and when trying asciidoctor against that the tests fail.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby3.1
ruby-signet_0.17.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-signet_0.17.0-1.dsc
ruby-signet_0.17.0.orig.tar.gz
ruby-signet_0.17.0-1.debian.tar.xz
ruby-signet_0.17.0-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: ruby-defau...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-defaults
Please create a tracker for removing ruby3.0 as a supported version.
Ben file (based on
On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 14:06:09 -0300 Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + unreproducible
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 07:20:31PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Source: ruby-prof
> > Version: 1.4.3-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> >
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:53:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026498: fixed in ruby-image-processing 1.10.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026498,
regarding ruby-image-processing: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:53:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026512: fixed in ruby-prof 1.4.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026512,
regarding ruby-prof: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:54:45 +0530
Source: ruby-prof
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
Changed-By:
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:41:56 +0530
Source: ruby-image-processing
Architecture: source
Version: 1.10.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
ruby-prof_1.4.3-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-prof_1.4.3-2.dsc
ruby-prof_1.4.3-2.debian.tar.xz
ruby-prof_1.4.3-2_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1026512 [src:ruby-prof] ruby-prof: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1026512: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026512
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
ruby-image-processing_1.10.3-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-image-processing_1.10.3-3.dsc
ruby-image-processing_1.10.3-3.debian.tar.xz
ruby-image-processing_1.10.3-3_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:36:05 +0530
with message-id <20221223090605.5ykiaiq7seqol...@nileshpatra.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#1019610: ruby-ahoy-email: FTBFS with ruby3.1: ERROR:
Test "ruby3.1" failed: cannot load such file -- net/smtp (LoadError)
has caused the Debian Bug report
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:36:05 +0530
with message-id <20221223090605.5ykiaiq7seqol...@nileshpatra.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#1019610: ruby-ahoy-email: FTBFS with ruby3.1: ERROR:
Test "ruby3.1" failed: cannot load such file -- net/smtp (LoadError)
has caused the Debian Bug report
81 matches
Mail list logo
