Hi Bernhard, Kees,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:58 PM Schmidt, Bernhard
wrote:
> > I've prepared a fix for the regression and uploaded the binaries at:
> > https://people.debian.org/~utkarsh/lts/ruby2.5/
> >
> > Can you please give these a try and see if that fixes the regression
> > you're seeing?
>
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:01 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> I see your 2.5.5-3+deb10u6 update on the debian/buster branch which
> fixes the broken +deb10u5 upload, but I don't see it in the archive
> yet.
>
> Although you mentioned you were going to wait a bit more, I'm just
> 100%-checking you
Hi Kees,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:53 PM Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
> I know you were asking Bernhard, but I downloaded and installed as well.
> Our Puppet agent seems to be happy again.
I had missed your comment in the bug but super, many thanks for
testing this out! I'll wait a bit more before I
Hi Bernhard,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 4:16 PM Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Yep, I'm taking a look to prep something for 2.5.
I've prepared a fix for the regression and uploaded the binaries at:
https://people.debian.org/~utkarsh/lts/ruby2.5/
Can you please give these a try and see if t
Hiya,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 2:39 PM Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Specifically
> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/03/28/redos-in-uri-cve-2023-28755/
> states:
>
> | For Ruby 2.7: Update to uri 0.10.0.1
> | For Ruby 3.0: Update to uri 0.10.2
> | For Ruby 3.1: Update to uri 0.11.1
> | For Rub
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 12:56 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Can you please have a look, as this seems to be caused by the DLA
> issued as DLA-3447-1.
This has been caused by the ruby2.5 update. Can you please TAL? This
is perhaps because of the URI version in buster v/s URI version
u
Source: redmine
Version: 5.0.2-2
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Please consider updating src:redmine to 5.0.3. TIA.
- u
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers focal-updates
APT policy: (500, 'focal-updates'), (500, 'focal-security'), (500, 'focal')
Architecture: amd64 (
Source: redmine
Version: 5.0.2-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
The package update performs a recursive chown, unnecessarily
increasing the update time (for instance, the recursive chown is
unnecessarily applied to ~60 000 files in an instance).
Please TAL and fix this if possible. Thanks!
- u
-- Sy
Source: redmine
Version: 5.0.2-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
Activating cert-based authentication on PostgreSQL requires having
redmine on its own UID. However the current Debian package tries to
chown a Gemfile, making this UID approach incompatible with the current
package.
Please TAL and fix this
Source: redmine
Version: 5.0.2-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
Redmine installed from its Debian package should be able to run from
its own (Linux) user. The REDMINE_INSTANCE_OWNERSHIP option in the
default configuration file (/etc/default/redmine/) seems to indicate
that such an execution mode is poss
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:38 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
> > You haven't answered my question: "does rails still work with the old
> > version of ruby-marcel and can the version bump be reverted"
>
> Ping. Without a proper answer, I can't decide.
Thanks, I'm yet to figure that out and hopefull
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 19 May 2021 22:12:59 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> This new rails version renewed its versioned dependency on ruby-marcel.
> The new ruby-marcel version doesn't look like a targeted fix, so it
> doesn't fit the freeze policy. If I read the changelog correctly, this
> dependency is t
Hi Praveen,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:24 PM Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I think the separate package was introduced by mistake without seeing
> the copy embedded in ruby. I think the right way is to fix this in ruby
> and remove this separate package. But I'd like someone from ruby team
> to confirm
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:49 PM Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
> > It looks like we will have to remove ruby-vcr and we will have to
> > disable tests for the following packages. I don't think there is
> > another w
Hi Praveen,
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Pirate Praveen wrote:
> It looks like we will have to remove ruby-vcr and we will have to
> disable tests for the following packages. I don't think there is
> another way, thoughts?
Maybe worth opening an issue upstream and discuss the cons of this
cha
Hi Salvatore,
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 1:34 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Not any right now. Well there is CVE-2020-26247 but that one might be
> too risky at this stage (AFAIU it is a breaking change, and thus ws
> moved to the 1.11.x version).
Lucas uploaded a new version, thereby fixing this
Hi Salvatore,
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 5:55 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Of course. Uploaded a fix! :)
> > (thanks for the explicit CC, please do it next time as well if you
> > want me to take care of something which falls under the Ruby team).
>
> Thanks! About the explicit CC, well actuall
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 2:02 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> While strictly speaking this issue is no-dsa for buster, I'm raising
> the severity to RC, would it be possible to address this issue for
> unstable (and so bullseye) before the freeze?
Of course. Uploaded a fix! :)
(thanks for
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 2:52 PM Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:11:27 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> > I love tests. As one of the maintainers of the ci.debian.net
> > infrastructure, I really do. However, with my Release Team member hat
> > on, I'm asking you to stop Build-D
Hi Sylvain,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 5:15 PM Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Then I realized that this is about Debian Jessie which reached
> end-of-life a month ago, so the solution is to upgrade to Debian 9.
Whilst I am totally fine by this suggestion, but still asking..
Would it make sense to fix this
On 8/3/20 1:56 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jul 2020 09:36:20 +0200 "s.jaekel" wrote:
>> Package: ruby-rails
>> Version: 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u7
>> Severity: important
>> Tags: upstream
>>
>> I updated the ruby-rails packages last week.
>&g
Hi
On Tue, 07 Jul 2020 09:36:20 +0200 "s.jaekel" wrote:
> Package: ruby-rails
> Version: 2:4.1.8-1+deb8u7
> Severity: important
> Tags: upstream
>
> I updated the ruby-rails packages last week.
> Since then i can use the also installed redmine (3.0~20140825-8~deb8u4)
> no longer link tickets tog
Hi Thorsten,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:30 AM Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
> you should have mentioned ruby-growl-4.1/lib/ruby-growl/ruby_logo.rb in your
> debian/copyright.
> Unfortunately the license of this file is not compatible with DFSG, so this
> software can not be part of Debian.
Re-sponso
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 3:11 PM Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Hmm, are you the only active maintainer for rails?
There are 3 maintainers. CC'ed rails@p.d.o.
However, since you have already worked on preparing the fix for
Jessie, it's much easier on your part to do it for Stretch and Buster.
But t
Hi all,
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 1:15 PM Hideki Yamane wrote:
> I've investigated it and it seems that failure happens with ruby-rspec
> 3.9.0c1e0m1s2-1, not 3.8.0c0e1m0s0-1 in buster.
Hm, interesting.
Could someone take a look at this whenever free?
I, myself, don't have enough time to take a l
Package: ruby-serverengine
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: critical
User pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ruby2.7-transition
Dear Maintainer,
Whilst building ruby-serverengine against Ruby2.5 and Ruby2.7, I
noticed that all the tests are failing and at one point, the tests
close 834716
thanks
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:08:57 +0200 Paul van Tilburg
wrote:
Package: bundler
Version: 1.12.5-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The man-pages are installed in the Ruby library directory,
as a result, they are unavailable to the user.
See the following partial file listing
Package: chef
Version: 13.8.7-4
Severity: critical
Dear Maintainer,
chef currently doesn't have support for Ruby2.7 and the latest version
of bundler, that is, 2.1.4.
The logs for Ruby2.7 failures are as follows:
https://people.debian.org/~kanashiro/ruby2.7/builds/7/chef/chef_13.8.7-4+rebuild
e9d3ebbdb8340b26424c10e5a55e7d6ef26e1ce0
[2]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-benchmark-suite
[3]: https://github.com/evanphx/benchmark_suite
Description: Remove "requirement" of benchmark/helpers.
This file is no longer provided by the upstream.
Author: Utkarsh Gupta
B
.
Right, since the CI passes on my fork, I've written a patch that is
attached.
Hope that should fix this :)
Additionally shall fix this in the repo as well.
Best,
Utkarsh
Description: This patch bumps rubyzip to 2.0.
Author: Utkarsh Gupta
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/944906
Las
Hi Dmitry,
On Sat, 02 Nov 2019 11:13:57 +1100 Dmitry Smirnov
wrote:
> Package: gitlab
> Version: 12.2.9-1
> Severity: serious
> Usertags: dfsg
>
>
> In most recent upload Utkarsh Gupta circumvented legitimate Lintian error
>
>
> E: gitlab source: source-is-mis
Hey,
On 24/07/19 10:53 am, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hey!
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:43:40AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
>> Hey Salvatore,
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:07:05 + Salvatore Bonaccorso
>> wrote:
>>> Source: ruby-mini-magick
>
Hey Salvatore,
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:07:05 + Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Source: ruby-mini-magick
> Source-Version: 4.9.2-1+deb10u1
>
> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> ruby-mini-magick, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
Where
Hi Dominik,
On 26/12/18 2:16 am, Dominik George wrote:
> Heisann, alle sammen,
>
> as announced in the recent thread about maintaining, I hereby propose a
> repository that allows making “backports” of packages available to users
> of the stable distribution, if those packages cannot be maintained
Hey,
On Mon 1 Apr, 2019, 2:31 AM Thorsten Alteholz, <
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please mention all licenses and all copyright holders in your
> debian/copyright.
>
Fixed and uploaded.
Please check the same :)
Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to re
Package: ruby-rails-assets-jquery-fullscreen-plugin
Version: 0.5.0+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The copyright details of the uploader are missing.
You should generally mention the copyright in order to avoid issues later
on.
Please update the same.
Best,
Utkarsh
-- System Informat
Package: rails
Version: 2:5.2.2.1+dfsg-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
It'd be good to have a manual page for rails.
There are basic commands/subcommands like `rails new`, `rails generate`,
etc and it'd be wonderful to have a quick look at the man page to know what
it does, briefly and also to
Hey,
It doesn't, because the package is in the maintainer's personal
repository[1].
He's the author of the gem itself, maybe that's why?
But shouldn't we be having it under the debian repositories with the
"debian" folder which is missing in this case (see [1])?
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/kei
Hey,
Although it is now detecting the tests but the autopkgtest is still failing.
I shall get this fixed in the next upload :)
Best,
Utkarsh
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-
39 matches
Mail list logo
