.
+ * Include VERSION file in package (Closes: #1035389)
+
+ -- Vivek K J Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:05:59 +0530
+
ruby-aws-sdk-core (3.104.3-3+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 8650938..3d8535e 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian
n3 package.
[1] -
https://github.com/chef/ohai/blob/6d64237f9987c3bf51805e19884e6e710c3a40f6/lib/ohai/plugins/python.rb#L26
--
Regards,
Vivek K J
Debian
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Regards,
Vivek K J
Debian Maintainer
-version.patch (Closes: #1028285)
-
- -- Vivek K J Mon, 09 Jan 2023 19:47:37 +0530
-
ruby-aws-sdk-core (3.104.3-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff -Nru ruby-aws-sdk-core-3.104.3/debian/patches/fix-version.patch
ruby-aws-sdk-core-3.104.3/debian/patches/fix-version.patch
--- ruby
Package: ruby-google-api-client
Version: 0.50.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: vive...@disroot.org
Hi,
On building this package against latest version of ruby-googleauth
(1.3.0) in experimental, your package failed to build
(Relevant log, hopefully)
*for migrating ruby-rouge 3.30 from experimental to unstable
Sorry for the mistake :)
--
Vivek K J
Debian Contributor
https://vivekkj.codes/
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https
stand why
>
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
>
> concerns.
Thanks,
Vivek K J
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
Hi,
Pushed the requested changes.
Thanks,
Vivek K J
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, October 5th, 2021 at 11:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please also mention at least "oyent, Inc. and other Node contributors" in
> your debian/copyright.
&g
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, October 6th, 2021 at 10:38 PM, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> On 6 October 2021 11:54:51 am IST, VIVEK K J vive...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Pushed the requested changes.
>
> I think you should mention
-‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, October 6th, 2021 at 10:32 PM, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> On 6/10/21 11:48 AM, VIVEK K J wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for pointing the issue. They've using WTFPL license in the
> > gemspec file. But in
which address our
>
> concerns.
[1] - https://github.com/digitalmoksha/uc.micro-rb/blob/v1.0.5/LICENSE
[2] -
https://github.com/digitalmoksha/uc.micro-rb/blob/master/uc.micro-rb.gemspec#L11
Thanks,
Vivek K J
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
skHA+U6PsV4ccyA4m7zEKPsV10xRrqrZhQekf96BvaQ8Y=
> =GfoC
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
Submitted a merge request[1] which closes this bug.
[1] - https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/coderay/-/merge_requests/1
--
Greetings,
Vivek K J
vive...@tchncs.de
www.vivekkj.me___
via /run/systemd/system)
> LSM: AppArmor: enabled
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
Hi there,
I can't reproduce this error in my debian sid system...Related
log available below...
️
Finished in 7.672068117 seconds.
-------
108 tests, 154 assertions, 0
13 matches
Mail list logo
