Vincent Fourmond dijo [Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:23:22PM +0200]:
> Hmmm. No. Unless I completely misunderstood Lucas's post (which is
> very possible, I have basic understanding problems ;-)...), what Lucas
> proposes is to drop pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers altogether. To this I
> strongly object.
>
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Vincent Fourmond dijo [Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 10:26:14PM +0200]:
>>> I think that we should switch to using only debian-ruby@ for everything
>>> except commit logs (which go to pkg-ruby-extras-commits@). This matches
>>> what the perl team does, and it seems to be totally bearabl
FYI: The status of the ruby-gnome2 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.18.1-1
Current version: 0.19.0-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will r
FYI: The status of the librmagick-ruby source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.5.2-1
Current version: 2.10.0-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wil
