Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 652773 patch
Bug #652773 [src:ruby-parsetree] ruby-parsetree: FTBFS: tests failed
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
652773: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6
tags 652773 patch
thanks
Hi,
I've fixed this FTBFS by adding a package to Build-Depends.
Please check it, thanks.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
diff -Nru ruby-parsetree-3.0.8/debian/changelog ruby-parsetree-3.0.8/debian/changel
libmixlib-log-ruby1.8_1.3.0-1_all.deb
to main/r/ruby-mixlib-log/libmixlib-log-ruby1.8_1.3.0-1_all.deb
libmixlib-log-ruby_1.3.0-1_all.deb
to main/r/ruby-mixlib-log/libmixlib-log-ruby_1.3.0-1_all.deb
(new) ruby-mixlib-log_1.3.0-1.debian.tar.gz optional ruby
(new) ruby-mixlib-log_1.3.0-1.dsc optio
ruby-mixlib-log_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-mixlib-log_1.3.0-1.dsc
ruby-mixlib-log_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz
ruby-mixlib-log_1.3.0-1.debian.tar.gz
ruby-mixlib-log_1.3.0-1_all.deb
libmixlib-log-ruby_1.3.0-1_all.deb
libmixlib-log-ruby1.8_1.3
(new) ruby-switch_0.1.0.dsc optional ruby
(new) ruby-switch_0.1.0.tar.gz optional ruby
(new) ruby-switch_0.1.0_all.deb optional ruby
switch between different Ruby interpreters
ruby-switch allows system administrators to easily switch between different
Ruby interpreters as the system-wide default
ruby-switch_0.1.0_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-switch_0.1.0.dsc
ruby-switch_0.1.0.tar.gz
ruby-switch_0.1.0_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
Your message dated Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:57:55 +0100
with message-id <20111229115755.gd4...@density.luon.net>
and subject line Closed by upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #647069,
regarding transitioning device to new policy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:46:09 +0100
with message-id <20111229114609.ga4...@density.luon.net>
and subject line Closed by upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #640030,
regarding Gem2deb transition and new upstream version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Thu Dec 29 19:03:10 UTC 2011
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: trac-bitten
> tags 633918 + pending
Bug #633918 [trac-bitten] trac-bitten: New u
FYI: The status of the libhaml-ruby source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.0.25-2
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: (no removal hint found)
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint
FYI: The status of the ruby-haml source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 3.1.4-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you w
FYI: The status of the ruby-text source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.2.0-1
Current version: 1.0.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will recei
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 642267
Bug #642267 {Done: Antonio Terceiro } [ruby-ffi] ruby-ffi:
FTBFS on ia64
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> thanks
Stopping processing her
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 653579 serious
Bug #653579 [rubygems] redmine: Installation fails
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
> merge 653350 653579
Bug#653350: redmine: redmine won't install with rubygems 1.8.12-1
Bug#653579: redmine: Installation fails
Merg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 653579 rubygems 1.8.12-1
Bug #653579 [redmine] redmine: Installation fails
Bug reassigned from package 'redmine' to 'rubygems'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions redmine/1.3.0+dfsg1-1.
Bug #653579 [rubygems] redmine: Installation
Source: ruby-hpricot
Version: 0.8.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: debian-i...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ia64
ruby-hpricot FTBFS on ia64:
| /usr/bin/ruby1.8 -I/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/test_runner.rb
| Loaded suite debian/ru
On 27/12/2011 12:25, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Package: redmine
> ...
> uninitialized constant Gem::SyckDefaultKey
> ...
gem2deb's fix is to call Gem.load_yaml before require 'yaml' is called
elsewhere.
Using that fix on redmine works too, in /usr/share/redmine/config/boot.rb :
class VendorB
Your message dated Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:57:56 +0100
with message-id <20111229115755.gd4...@density.luon.net>
and subject line Closed by upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #647069,
regarding transitioning device to new policy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:46:10 +0100
with message-id <20111229114609.ga4...@density.luon.net>
and subject line Closed by upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #640030,
regarding Gem2deb transition and new upstream version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
libmixlib-cli-ruby1.8_1.2.2-1_all.deb
to main/r/ruby-mixlib-cli/libmixlib-cli-ruby1.8_1.2.2-1_all.deb
libmixlib-cli-ruby1.9.1_1.2.2-1_all.deb
to main/r/ruby-mixlib-cli/libmixlib-cli-ruby1.9.1_1.2.2-1_all.deb
libmixlib-cli-ruby_1.2.2-1_all.deb
to main/r/ruby-mixlib-cli/libmixlib-cli-ruby_1.2.2
ruby-mixlib-cli_1.2.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-mixlib-cli_1.2.2-1.dsc
ruby-mixlib-cli_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz
ruby-mixlib-cli_1.2.2-1.debian.tar.gz
ruby-mixlib-cli_1.2.2-1_all.deb
libmixlib-cli-ruby_1.2.2-1_all.deb
libmixlib-cli-ruby1.8_1.2
(new) ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz optional ruby
(new) ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-1.dsc optional ruby
(new) ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-1_all.deb optional ruby
Ruby library generating Rakefiles to build C extensions to Ruby
The mkrf Ruby library generates Rakefilesto build extensions to Ruby written
i
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-1.dsc
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909484
Title:
rubygems1.9.1 doesn't install on lucid
Status in “libgems-ruby” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
I can't install rubygems1.9.1 on a lucid server. It seems that
Public bug reported:
I can't install rubygems1.9.1 on a lucid server. It seems that the
package ruby1.9.1 doesn't provide ruby and creates a problem on the gem
package.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: rubygems1.9.1 1.3.5-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-37.81-ser
Dear all,
I confirm this problem during upgrade of redmine to 1.3 with rubygems_1.8.12-1
and
switching back to rubygems_1.8.10-1 (using snapshot.debian.org) is then a
temporary
solution.
Regards,
Patrice.
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing l
Package: redmine
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi there,
I'm actually using Debian Stable redmine version (1.0) but some additionnals
plugins that I have to install require 1.2.x. I saw that some backporting works
have already been done and we have 1.1 in squeeze-backports, it would be r
Package: redmine
Version: 1.2.2+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Dear Jérémy,
trying to install redmine version 1.2.2 or the newer 1.3.0 from unstable fails
with rubygems 1.8.12-1 from unstable, whereas with rubygems 1.8.10-1 from
testing it is installlable (although with warnings like NOTE:
Gem::Source
Public bug reported:
Installing package with apt-get install redmine
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: redmine 0.9.3-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-37.81-generic 2.6.32.49+drm33.21
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-37-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Dec 23 23:53:26 2011
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908356
Title:
package redmine 0.9.3-1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus
script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie
d'état 1
Status in “redmine” pack
30 matches
Mail list logo
