[DRE-maint] Processed: this is a bug in fuzzaldrin-plus.min.js

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libjs-fuzzaldrin-plus Bug #814871 [gitlab] gitlab doesn't allow to edit issues Bug reassigned from package 'gitlab' to 'libjs-fuzzaldrin-plus'. No longer marked as found in versions gitlab/8.4.3+dfsg-7 and gitlab/8.4.3+dfsg-8. Ignoring request to alter

[DRE-maint] ruby-rails-assets-diaspora-jsxc is marked for autoremoval from testing

ruby-rails-assets-diaspora-jsxc 0.1.4+dfsg~alpha.1-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-04-30 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 818461: ruby-rails-assets-favico.js: missing dependencies on ruby modules ___

[DRE-maint] ruby-mecab is marked for autoremoval from testing

ruby-mecab 0.99.6-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-04-30 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 818535: mecab: FTBFS: error: required file './compile' not found ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] bsfilter is marked for autoremoval from testing

bsfilter 1:1.0.19-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-04-30 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 818535: mecab: FTBFS: error: required file './compile' not found ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-mousetrap-rails is marked for autoremoval from testing

ruby-mousetrap-rails 1.4.6-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-04-30 It is affected by these RC bugs: 818470: ruby-mousetrap-rails: missing dependencies on ruby modules ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] Bug#815802: marked as done (ruby-gir-ffi: Requiring 'gir_ffi' fails)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2016 22:48:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#815802: fixed in ruby-gir-ffi 0.9.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #815802, regarding ruby-gir-ffi: Requiring 'gir_ffi' fails to be marked as done. This means that you

[DRE-maint] Bug#819078: marked as done (ruby-uconv ships without a gemspec file)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2016 22:48:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#819078: fixed in ruby-uconv 0.6.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #819078, regarding ruby-uconv ships without a gemspec file to be marked as done. This means that you

[DRE-maint] ruby-augeas_0.6.4-1_source.changes REJECTED

Version check failed: Your upload included the source package ruby-augeas, version 0.6.4-1, however testing already has version 1:0.5.0-3. Uploads to unstable must have a higher version than present in testing. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your

[DRE-maint] ruby-uconv_0.6.1-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 19:21:51 -0300 Source: ruby-uconv Binary: ruby-uconv Architecture: source Version: 0.6.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers

[DRE-maint] Processing of ruby-gir-ffi_0.9.0-2_source.changes

ruby-gir-ffi_0.9.0-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ruby-gir-ffi_0.9.0-2.dsc ruby-gir-ffi_0.9.0-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___

[DRE-maint] Processing of ruby-augeas_0.6.4-1_source.changes

ruby-augeas_0.6.4-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ruby-augeas_0.6.4-1.dsc ruby-augeas_0.6.4.orig.tar.gz ruby-augeas_0.6.4-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

[DRE-maint] ruby-omniauth-oauth2 1.4.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the ruby-omniauth-oauth2 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.2.0-3 Current version: 1.4.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day

[DRE-maint] berkshelf-api_2.1.3-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:berkshelf-api is NEW. source:berkshelf-api is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are