FYI: The status of the ruby-cairo source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.15.9-2
Current version: 1.15.9-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will re
FYI: The status of the ruby-pkg-config source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.2.3-2
Current version: 1.2.4-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
ruby-buff-config 1.0.1-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-09-02
It is affected by these RC bugs:
870753: ruby-buff-config: ruby-buff-config FTBFS with ruby-buff-extensions
2.0.0-1
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-ext
rubocop 0.48.1+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-09-03
It is affected by these RC bugs:
870852: rubocop: CVE-2017-8418
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.ali
open-build-service 2.7.4-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-09-02
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
869034: ruby-combustion: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed.
869038: ruby-rspec-rails: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.3" failed.
869039: ruby-kaminari: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
ruby-kramdown-rfc2629 1.0.36-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2017-09-03
It is affected by these RC bugs:
870849: ruby-kramdown-rfc2629: ruby-kramdown-rfc2629 FTBFS with ruby-kramdown
1.14.0-1
___
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
P
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:36:15 +0900
Source: ruby-serverspec
Binary: ruby-serverspec
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.40.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By:
ruby-serverspec_2.40.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-serverspec_2.40.0-1.dsc
ruby-serverspec_2.40.0.orig.tar.gz
ruby-serverspec_2.40.0-1.debian.tar.xz
ruby-serverspec_2.40.0-1_all.deb
ruby-serverspec_2.40.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:17:23 +0900
Source: ruby-specinfra
Binary: ruby-specinfra
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.70.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
Changed-By: HI
ruby-specinfra_2.70.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ruby-specinfra_2.70.1-1.dsc
ruby-specinfra_2.70.1.orig.tar.gz
ruby-specinfra_2.70.1-1.debian.tar.xz
ruby-specinfra_2.70.1-1_all.deb
ruby-specinfra_2.70.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 871056 by 827076 828329 828413 828420 828429 828441 828449 828451
> 828471 828475 828477 828481 828483 828503 828520 828522 828557 828572 835801
> 844303 847611 848680 850886 850888 850890 850895 850897 850898 851054 851069
> 851070 85107
Hi,
the copyright holder does not seem to match the Author. Is this intentionally?
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
_
Dear maintainer(s),
The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
currently open in the Wheezy version of ruby-passenger:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/ruby-passenger
Would you like to take care of this yourself?
If yes, please follow the workfl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 871893 pending
Bug #871893 [src:vagrant-libvirt] vagrant-libvirt: Please update the Uploaders
list
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #871893 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: src:vagrant-libvirt
Severity: minor
Tags: pending
User: nomad...@debian.org
Usertags: cleanup
As title says.
I haven't been really involved in the maintenance of this package.
I intend to keep an eye on this package for the current stable release
lifecycle. However, it's very unlikely I
15 matches
Mail list logo