[DRE-maint] diaspora-gems-compat_0.5.0.0+debian1_amd64.changes REJECTED

As requested by mail. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-fog-xml_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

As requested by maintainer (closes wrong bug). === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

Re: [DRE-maint] ruby-font-awesome-rails_4.0.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Pirate Praveen prav...@debian.org writes: I hope this is a dak failure and will be taken care without any intervension from me. No, the error message isn't really helpful (that's a dak failure), but the problem is that your source package cannot be extracted: +--- | % dpkg-source -x

[DRE-maint] ruby-sinon-rails_1.4.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, the binary package contains only three *.rb files which don't seem to contain any actual code? -rw-r--r-- root/root90 2013-06-23 15:55 ./usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/sinon-rails.rb -rw-r--r-- root/root 144 2013-06-23 15:55 ./usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/sinon/rails/engine.rb

[DRE-maint] ruby-simplecov-html_0.7.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, the sources for several minimized javascript libraries are missing. The source and copyright information for assets/stylesheets/reset.css and public/application.css are missing. Ansgar === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-cookiejar_0.3.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I cannot find any license information in the upstream tarball. Where does it come from? Please document in d/copyright if it comes from an external source. Also please ask upstream to include license information in the release tarballs. Ansgar

[DRE-maint] ruby-webmock_1.11.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, the upstream tarball contains code from other projects without the required copyright notice, for example lib/webmock/util/json.rb spec/quality_spec.rb and maybe lib/webmock/util/version_checker.rb as well. Note that one of the conditions from the Expat/MIT license is The above

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding messagebus-ruby-api_3.0.7+git.20130130.97b34ece-1_amd64.changes

Hi, why doesn't the binary package name follow the ruby-module scheme? Ansgar ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-right-http-connection_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi, should lib/version.rb really be installed into ./usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/version.rb? That looks wrong to me. Ansgar ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] ruby-bson-ext_1.8.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

ext/cbson/encoding_helpers.c doesn't grant permission to modify. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-activesupport-4.0_4.0.0~beta1-1_amd64.changes

Hi, what is the source for lib/active_support/values/unicode_tables.dat? It looks like some kind of serialized data structure used by lib/active_support/multibyte/unicode.rb, but I'm not sure how it was generated. Ansgar ___

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-atomic_1.1.9-1_amd64.changes

Hi, please refer to the full text of the Apache license in /usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2.0 instead of including the full license text in your next upload. Ansgar ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-asciidoctor_0.1.3~ds1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

As requested by Per Andersson === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-remotipart_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes

Hi, vendor/assets/javascripts/jquery.iframe-transport.js is licensed under GPL-2 or Expat and likely has a different copyright holder. Please include it in d/copyright in your next upload. Ansgar ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list

[DRE-maint] ruby-aruba_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, the source for templates/js/jquery-1.6.1.min.js is missing. In addition the copyright and license information for templates/images/* is missing (note that the files are also licensed under CC-BY 3.0, see the link included in LICENSE). Ansgar === Please feel free to respond to this email

[DRE-maint] ruby-spoon_0.0.2~git20130104-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, I could not find any statement that ruby-spoon is actually licensed under the Apache license, just including the license text is not enough. To quote LICENSE: Work shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-shadow_2.1.4-1_amd64.changes

Hi, debian/copyright says same terms as ruby, but upstream tarball includes note License: Free for any use with your own risk! (which doesn't explicitly allow redistribution or modification). Where do you get the other license conditions from? Regards, Ansgar

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-actionpack-3.2_3.2.3-1_amd64.changes

Hi, please add the copyright information for action_controller/vendor/html-scanner/html/selector.rb in the next upload. Regards, Ansgar ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[DRE-maint] ruby-railties-3.2_3.2.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, the packages misses at least copyright notices for guides/assets/javascripts/syntaxhighlighter/*.js. It might also miss the source for shCore.js. Regards, Ansgar === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new

[DRE-maint] ruby-opengl_0.60.1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, I have to reject the package: examples/misc/fbo_test.rb doesn't allow distributing modified versions and the source for ext/common/gl-enums.h and ext/{common,glu}/glu-enums.c seems to be missing (it is generated from some other file). Regards, Ansgar === Please feel free to respond to

[DRE-maint] ruby-mocha_0.11.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, I have to reject the package as it contains a minimized version of jquery.js (in doc/js) for which no source is included. Regards, Ansgar === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our

[DRE-maint] Comments regarding ruby-cmdparse_2.0.3-1_amd64.changes

Hi, debian/copyright states LGPL-3 as does the README in the tarball, but the source files say either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. Regards, Ansgar ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list