Bug#807041: logind: laptop unexpectedly auto-suspends after some time of inactivity

2019-03-10 Thread George B.
On 10/03/2019 11:53, Michael Biebl wrote: Hi George Have you filed such an upstream bug report? https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/2346 It was closed though. :( Thanks, George ___ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list Pkg-systemd-maintain

Bug#911290: policy-rcd-declarative

2019-03-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
I just uploaded (to experimental) a package policy-rcd-declarative, which ships a policy-rc.d script that can be configured through static files, in an attempt to address some of the issues pointed out in this bug report. It's not yet ready for prime time (hence the upload to experimental rather t

Bug#902416: Bug#890950: RE: Bug#902416: systemd: systemctl hibernate: unable to resume after upgrade

2019-03-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 00:20 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Ben > > Am 10.03.19 um 23:17 schrieb Ben Hutchings: > > I think it would make sense for systemd to only set the hibernation > > device if it's not already set (i.e. if /sys/power/resume contains > > "0:0\n"). > > I get $ cat /sys/power/

Bug#902416: Bug#890950: RE: Bug#902416: systemd: systemctl hibernate: unable to resume after upgrade

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Ben Am 10.03.19 um 23:17 schrieb Ben Hutchings: > I think it would make sense for systemd to only set the hibernation > device if it's not already set (i.e. if /sys/power/resume contains > "0:0\n"). I get $ cat /sys/power/resume 8:4 which part is responsible for setting that? -- Why is it t

Bug#902416: Bug#890950: RE: Bug#902416: systemd: systemctl hibernate: unable to resume after upgrade

2019-03-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2019-03-10 at 19:25 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Mario, > > > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:41:37 + wrote: [...] > > Yes I could see two swap partitions causing the wrong one to be picked. > > It's trying to select the bigger of the two. > > > > If they don't match the one you're puttin

Bug#670843: marked as done (udev shows too unspecific error messages)

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:57:30 +0100 with message-id <332ae5e5-3728-f5f9-d49f-e0b45fbb3...@debian.org> and subject line Re: udev shows too unspecific error messages has caused the Debian Bug report #670843, regarding udev shows too unspecific error messages to be marked as done. This

Bug#788586: marked as done (udev: "udevadm trigger /dev/input/event*" doesn't work)

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:55:22 +0100 with message-id <5540b0ea-4cf9-c2b1-037a-aa3eab959...@debian.org> and subject line Re: udev: incorrect documentation in /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb has caused the Debian Bug report #788499, regarding udev: "udevadm trigger /dev/input/event*"

Bug#788499: marked as done (udev: incorrect documentation in /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb)

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 22:55:22 +0100 with message-id <5540b0ea-4cf9-c2b1-037a-aa3eab959...@debian.org> and subject line Re: udev: incorrect documentation in /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb has caused the Debian Bug report #788499, regarding udev: incorrect documentation in /lib/ude

Processed: Bug #924199 in systemd marked as pending

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #924199 [udev] Removing an LVM snapshot logs `dmsetup info` error Added tag(s) pending. -- 924199: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924199 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __

Processed: Bug #921280 in systemd marked as pending

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #921280 [systemd] systemd-cgtop no longer shows memory usage Added tag(s) pending. -- 921280: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921280 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___

Bug#922647: Info received (Bug#922647: systemd --user no longer running)

2019-03-10 Thread Julien Leproust
I tried the fix_db.pl script, there was no output. Here is the only relevant difference: --- debconf.old/config.datâ–¸-2019-03-10 18:43:37.265483165 +0100 +++ debconf/config.datâ–¸-2019-03-10 18:43:41.261085496 +0100 @@ -1151,7 +1151,7 @@ Name: libpam-modules/disable-screensaver Template: lib

Bug#867590: networkd removes statically set default route when RA expires

2019-03-10 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:12:57AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Is this still an issue with 241-1 from unstable? Sorry, this is a productive system, I cannot just do upgrades to unstable in that network setup to check wether a bug reported and worked around nearly two years ago was fixed upstream

Processed: tagging 921280

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 921280 - moreinfo Bug #921280 [systemd] systemd-cgtop no longer shows memory usage Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 921280: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#902416: RE: Bug#902416: systemd: systemctl hibernate: unable to resume after upgrade

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Mario, On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:41:37 + wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael Biebl [mailto:bi...@debian.org] > > Sent: Friday, July 6, 2018 5:46 AM > > To: Joel Cross; 902...@bugs.debian.org; Limonciello, Mario > > Subject: Re: Bug#902416: systemd: systemctl hibernate: una

Bug#902026: systemd: "systemctl start systemd-timesyncd.service" kills chrony

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 22:02:11 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 24.07.2018 um 21:33 schrieb Francesco Poli: > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 01:46:51 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > > > >> Am 23.07.2018 um 19:53 schrieb Francesco Poli: > > [...] > >>> I am again pondering whether I should mask systemd-timesyncd

Re: Timer Disabling on Package Update? (is: #922031)

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.03.19 um 18:23 schrieb Harlan Lieberman-Berg: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 1:19 PM Michael Biebl wrote: >> Let's bump this to serious. I think you should consider making another >> stable upload for this. >> As users have pointed out, systems which aren't rebooted regularly are >> otherwise up

Re: Timer Disabling on Package Update? (is: #922031)

2019-03-10 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 1:19 PM Michael Biebl wrote: > Let's bump this to serious. I think you should consider making another > stable upload for this. > As users have pointed out, systems which aren't rebooted regularly are > otherwise up for a nasty experience. > You might consider asking the se

Re: Timer Disabling on Package Update? (is: #922031)

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Control: severity -1 serious Let's bump this to serious. I think you should consider making another stable upload for this. As users have pointed out, systems which aren't rebooted regularly are otherwise up for a nasty experience. You might consider asking the security team to distribute the upda

Re: Timer Disabling on Package Update? (is: #922031)

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.03.19 um 17:59 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 10.03.19 um 17:54 schrieb Michael Biebl: >> Am 10.03.19 um 17:36 schrieb Harlan Lieberman-Berg: >>> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:29 PM Michael Biebl wrote: Can you provide the output of systemctl status certbot.timer journalctl -u certb

Re: Timer Disabling on Package Update? (is: #922031)

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.03.19 um 17:54 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 10.03.19 um 17:36 schrieb Harlan Lieberman-Berg: >> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:29 PM Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Can you provide the output of >>> systemctl status certbot.timer >>> journalctl -u certbot.timer >> >> The output of `systemctl show certbo

Re: Timer Disabling on Package Update? (is: #922031)

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.03.19 um 17:36 schrieb Harlan Lieberman-Berg: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:29 PM Michael Biebl wrote: >> Can you provide the output of >> systemctl status certbot.timer >> journalctl -u certbot.timer > > The output of `systemctl show certbot.timer` is at > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Re: Bug#924255: stretch-pu: package systemd/232-25+deb9u10

2019-03-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, (Replying from a d-i point of view.) Michael Biebl (2019-03-10): > I'd like to make a stable upload for systemd, fixing 5 separate issues. > Two of them have a CVE. > > The changelog is > > systemd (232-25+deb9u10) stretch; urgency=medium > > * journald: fix assertion failure on journal

Re: Timer Disabling on Package Update? (is: #922031)

2019-03-10 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:29 PM Michael Biebl wrote: > Can you provide the output of > systemctl status certbot.timer > journalctl -u certbot.timer The output of `systemctl show certbot.timer` is at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=922031;filename=systemctl-show-certbot.ti

Re: Timer Disabling on Package Update? (is: #922031)

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.03.19 um 17:05 schrieb Harlan Lieberman-Berg: > Hello pkg-systemd! > > There's a strange bug being reported in the stable-updated version of > certbot about the systemd timer that I'm having trouble reproducing or > understanding how it could happen. > > According to the users reporting the

Re: Bug#924255: stretch-pu: package systemd/232-25+deb9u10

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.03.19 um 16:55 schrieb Michael Biebl: > I'd like to make a stable upload for systemd, fixing 5 separate issues. > Two of them have a CVE. ... > The fix for CVE-2018-15686/#912005 is the most invasive one. I based it > partially on what was uploaded to old-stable by the debian-lts team. > Wi

Timer Disabling on Package Update? (is: #922031)

2019-03-10 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Hello pkg-systemd! There's a strange bug being reported in the stable-updated version of certbot about the systemd timer that I'm having trouble reproducing or understanding how it could happen. According to the users reporting the issue, between the update from 0.10~ to 0.28.0.1~deb9u1, the syst

Bug#888222: systemd: invalid mount order of btrfs subvolumes after apt upgrade and reboot

2019-03-10 Thread LeJacq, Jean Pierre
On Saturday, March 9, 2019 6:10:16 PM EDT Michael Biebl wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:52:56 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:39:29 -0500 "LeJacq, Jean Pierre" > > > > wrote: > > > Package: systemd > > > Version: 236-3~bpo9+1 >

Bug#924255: stretch-pu: package systemd/232-25+deb9u10

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I'd like to make a stable upload for systemd, fixing 5 separate issues. Two of them have a CVE. The changelog is systemd (232-25+deb9u10) stretch; urgency=medium * journal

Processed: Bug #918400 in systemd marked as pending

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #918400 [systemd] systemd: Shell style globs do not work as expected with the tmpfiles.d 'e' type Added tag(s) pending. -- 918400: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=918400 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Bug #917122 in systemd marked as pending

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #917122 [systemd] systemd can not start without name_to_handle_at option Added tag(s) pending. -- 917122: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917122 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___

Processed: Bug #916880 in systemd marked as pending

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #916880 [systemd] Journald crashes in log_assert_failed() Added tag(s) pending. -- 916880: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916880 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __

Bug#807041: logind: laptop unexpectedly auto-suspends after some time of inactivity

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi George On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:31:16 + "George B." wrote: > Package: systemd > Version: 238-2 > Followup-For: Bug #807041 > > tags 807041 - moreinfo > thanks > > Hello, > > Tried this again after allowing the recent update to replace my config > with package default. > > Yes, the proble

Bug#924199: Removing an LVM snapshot logs `dmsetup info` error

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream patch Am 10.03.19 um 11:57 schrieb Christian Kastner: > On 10.03.19 11:07, Michael Biebl wrote: >> I suppose this is caused by >> >> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/a75211421fc9366068e6d9446e8e567246c72feb >> >> Could you check if >> https://github.com/sys

Processed: Re: Bug#924199: Removing an LVM snapshot logs `dmsetup info` error

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 fixed-upstream patch Bug #924199 [udev] Removing an LVM snapshot logs `dmsetup info` error Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and patch. -- 924199: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924199 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi

Bug#804438: marked as done (systemctl disable --now fails for aliased D-Bus services)

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:08:40 +0100 with message-id <662bf90b-556d-3ba7-baeb-bde63e092...@debian.org> and subject line Re: systemctl disable --now fails for aliased D-Bus services has caused the Debian Bug report #804438, regarding systemctl disable --now fails for aliased D-Bus serv

Bug#924199: Removing an LVM snapshot logs `dmsetup info` error

2019-03-10 Thread Christian Kastner
On 10.03.19 11:07, Michael Biebl wrote: > I suppose this is caused by > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/a75211421fc9366068e6d9446e8e567246c72feb > > Could you check if > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/3c37dadf627677eef62fcfc0c0f07cc67c748a9e > helps? Yes, that solved the i

Bug#806885: marked as done (systemd: Unable to disable mount of /run/user/$something)

2019-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:54:16 +0100 with message-id <6e2483f2-0dc8-1862-bb30-ab8559c14...@debian.org> and subject line Re: systemd: Unable to disable mount of /run/user/$something has caused the Debian Bug report #806885, regarding systemd: Unable to disable mount of /run/user/$somet

Bug#924199: Removing an LVM snapshot logs `dmsetup info` error

2019-03-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.03.19 um 10:41 schrieb Christian Kastner: > Package: udev > Version: 241-1 > Severity: minor > > Removing an LVM snapshot logs an error. Steps to reproduce: > > # lvcreate --snapshot --size 500M --name testsnap $SOMEVOLUME > # lvremove --force testsnap > > # journalctl -n 1 >

Bug#924199: Removing an LVM snapshot logs `dmsetup info` error

2019-03-10 Thread Christian Kastner
Package: udev Version: 241-1 Severity: minor Removing an LVM snapshot logs an error. Steps to reproduce: # lvcreate --snapshot --size 500M --name testsnap $SOMEVOLUME # lvremove --force testsnap # journalctl -n 1 systemd-udevd[21406]: Process '/sbin/dmsetup info -j 254 -m 14 -c